Does Paneria PAM187 ETA 6497-1 lowbeat 18,000 VPH use Novodiac shock absorber

[end72]

Hello Paneristi,

 

I just want to confirm if Genuine Paneria PAM187 ETA 6497-1 lowbeat 18,000 VPH used Novodiac shock absorber or Novodiac shock spring . I know that PAM187 ETA 6497-2 uses the incabloc with swan neck because this is hi beat 21,600 vph. 

 

Any expert advise?

Edited April 2, 2014 by end72

[hugop]

Panerai 187 uses a 7750 automatic chrono movement.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[end72]

I believed that is PAM087 Paneria luminor OP6541 case number uses valjoux 7750 movement. PAM187 uses 6497-1 low beat 18000 VPH and 6497-2 hi beat

Edited April 3, 2014 by end72

[hugop]

This is my 187 with Asian 7750.

[end72]

hello there yes you are right Im sorry I mean PAM183

Edited April 3, 2014 by end72

[hugop]

183 should be an OP XI 6497-2 running 21,600 and yes incablock

Not sure of models that used the 6497-1

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Edited April 3, 2014 by hugop

[end72]

I read a thread from peepshow about the 6497-1 movement in Paneria that "needle regulator plus Novodiac shock protection plus straight spokes on the balance wheel = Swiss". I hope peepshow can chime in

[ogladio]

6497-1 were used in pre-V models - or at least those with good ears so say...

[ceejay]

6497 Novodiac,

6497-1 Incabloc,

6497-2 Incabloc.

[w0lf]

ETA6497-1 were only used in PAM 00318

 

Pre-Vendome watches use UT 6497

 

Panerai 183 uses an OPXI caliber based on ETA6497-2

[end72]

Thanks for your post guys but I believed PAM 183 comes on two variants 6497-1 low beat 18000 VPH and 6497-2 Hi beat 21600 VPH. Any additional input guys?

[projectologist]

Thanks for your post guys but I believed PAM 183 comes on two variants 6497-1 low beat 18000 VPH and 6497-2 Hi beat 21600 VPH. Any additional input guys?

I have no idea where you got your information, but starting with the addition of the 183 to the OP lineup in 2004, OP has always used the ETA6497-2 movement (as member w0lf stated above).

Google "Panerai 183g" > Images, look at the movement pics, and you will have your answer.

Edited April 11, 2014 by projectologist

[Inertiadrifter]

Wolf and projectologist spoke

Enough said

Can't get any better than that