Craytonic Posted January 24, 2007 Report Share Posted January 24, 2007 The crown guard on the 050 looks just as thin to me; I doubt they cranked out a special, better one just for the 050? I do see the dial print issues; I guess when they get that fixed it will be accurate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovepanerai Posted January 24, 2007 Report Share Posted January 24, 2007 The crown guard on the 050 looks just as thin to me; I doubt they cranked out a special, better one just for the 050? I do see the dial print issues; I guess when they get that fixed it will be accurate. the crown guard and crown are actually pretty accurate on the 50 - remember it is 40mm PAM and has a different skinnier crown guard - of course you are right that if the issues get fixed on the Logo it would be great - but than again that is true for a lot of the replicas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craytonic Posted January 24, 2007 Report Share Posted January 24, 2007 I take it this is the most correct version? http://replica-watch.info/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14791 Appears to have the correct "12" and "6" to me, but it is late and my eyes are bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovepanerai Posted January 24, 2007 Report Share Posted January 24, 2007 here is a gen 48 for comparison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craytonic Posted January 24, 2007 Report Share Posted January 24, 2007 Wow very close, the crown is very thin like you said on the gen. The font on the gen does look a tad heavier/bolder. Also don't see any AR coating on the rep (Josh does claim "light AR"); but perhaps the gen doesn't have it either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.