Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Recommended Posts

Posted

What do you guys think?   Just got these QC pics from a TD.   not one to nit pick but I want to make sure I am getting the best example possible.  

Markers look to be a little wonky, not sure on dial printing   Or could just be my eyes playing tricks on me....

Any feedback is appreciated 

tony 

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

Posted

Most of these I've seen so far have the 'wobbly' markers on them, tbh I think you will notice much less on the wrist, great piece btw :inverted:

Posted

The 25 marker is definitely off. Personally I'd reject it. Yes it's macro but with my OCD I'd stare at it every time I looked at the dial. The 5, 35, and 40 are all off too. I've seen better QC pics of this piece. This is terrible.

Posted
14 hours ago, indywatchguy said:

The 25 marker is definitely off. Personally I'd reject it. Yes it's macro but with my OCD I'd stare at it every time I looked at the dial. The 5, 35, and 40 are all off too. I've seen better QC pics of this piece. This is terrible.

I agree Indy.   I rejected this one a couple days ago.  Still waiting a new set of QC pics.I'll keep you posted.    The TD fought pretty hard to get me to accept this one.... Said it was the angle of the camera etc etc.   BS.    

Hopefully the TD comes thru with prime example that I know can be found 

 

Posted

I didn't pay much attention to be honest... Here is my ZF. The 25 marker is similar.

2466F820-DA87-47E2-8CCC-2F4482007ACC_zpsg2jzngci.jpg

Sent using the "Force"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up