D

[CLA82]

 

C

[freddy333]

If you want opinions on a component, post good, clear pics of the component. Otherwise, it is difficult to offer anything useful.
What I can say is that all of my 62xx Daytonas have MQ dials.

[CLA82]

Sure - Got the picture from MQ himself. Will ask for better pictures........


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[alligoat]

The dial looks pretty good to me- good crown emblem, faded Daytona which is ok for an aged dial.

[CLA82]

Thanks for inputs - I just Think the circle lines in the subdials looks poor. Is it just me or ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[wiesn089]

From what I can tell from the pics, it looks great, though clear pictures of the subdials would certainly help. 

[philwongnz]

Will be ideal to see the serif of the Daytona

[CLA82]

Thanks - have asked for better pics


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[freddy333]

9 hours ago, lacour180 said:

Can anyone Chime in. Is it good or has it flaws ?

Here is a gen for reference & remember there are also minor variations -

[CLA82]

What About this dial ?

 

any opinions ? 

 

 

[alligoat]

The more that I look at the first dial, the more that I wonder if the Rolex Oyster Cosmograph printing isn't lopsided- or is it the Rolex crown not properly centered?

The second dial has a pretty thick Daytona, and not as nice a center crown emblem.

But the thing is, you have to remember these are rep dials- good, but not perfect. You just have to make a decision based on the fewest faults, price point and which you like the best- there is not a really right answer.

[freddy333]

The crown on the 1st dial is slightly off, but, overall, I think it is better than the 2nd dial, which looks like a standard aftermarket dial.

But, as always, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.