rolojack Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 I don't often get to work on these.... It's a pleasant watch. I'm not sure of the specs as I only modified the case and assembled the watch here, so I'll let the owner step in if he wants to tell us more about his watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 Nice. I always wondered why the rep makers don't make good out-of-the-box vintage reps. Like the 1675 and Tudor Subs. These would sell like hotcakes. Ah well they do, but they're all utter shite. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sogeha Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 3 minutes ago, By-Tor said: Nice. I always wondered why the rep makers don't make good out-of-the-box vintage reps. Like the 1675 and Tudor Subs. These would sell like hotcakes. Ah well they do, but they're all utter shite. I suspect the answer to that is that we, the members of all the forums are a tiny section of the market and Chinese domestic customers are the biggest buyers. We want vintage, they want current models. Current models are therefore where the money is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted July 17, 2017 Report Share Posted July 17, 2017 Good point. General public don't even know what Tudor is. But I'd love to see that classic 1675 well done (as in your signature). They make the shitty versions so why not make it properly? It's such a simple watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sogeha Posted July 18, 2017 Report Share Posted July 18, 2017 Not a 1675, but I love everything about this new Tempus Machina other than the price. Vintage looks, modern practicality. The bezel insert is sapphire. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.