FxrAndy Posted January 18, 2007 Report Posted January 18, 2007 I am not an expert on any thing never mind vintage rollies but do the lug holes on this 5513 look to small? 5513 on the bay
KB Posted January 18, 2007 Report Posted January 18, 2007 No they look about right to me of course it might be that genuine Rolex motor that has me thinking that way Ken
ubiquitous Posted January 18, 2007 Report Posted January 18, 2007 Looks fine to me. It's a late model (R serial puts it around 1988 production range); gloss dial with WG surrounds, correct 93150 bracelet, crystal, etc. etc. Lug holes are correct. EDIT: After reading the description, all the details listed above are given already in the auction. Sorry about that. I tend to look at the watch first, evaluate and report what I see without reading much of the item description...
FxrAndy Posted January 18, 2007 Author Report Posted January 18, 2007 It was just the lug holes that made me think, proberbly becayse i am used to seeing huge close ups here!
thewightstuff Posted January 23, 2007 Report Posted January 23, 2007 i know each to their own but i hate these 5513s with a passion. why anyone would want a late WG 5513 over a 14060 i dont know. they are just nasty. rolex really dropped the ball with these and should have brought out the 14060 earlier imho rather than tacking these onto the fine 5513 line. the 93150 stamp on the bracelet doesnt look up to usual standard as an aside
ubiquitous Posted January 23, 2007 Report Posted January 23, 2007 I agree... The WG indicies just look terribly out of place on a 5513, especially with the acrylic pearl.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now