imleg Posted May 2, 2006 Report Share Posted May 2, 2006 Hello guys Interesting in buying a PAM rep and want to know if the PAM 104 with asian 7750 offered by is a good choice and worth it. http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=3673 Thanks for your input Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviemeatballs Posted May 2, 2006 Report Share Posted May 2, 2006 (edited) I have that exact watch and $189 is a deal. Notice that it does not have the recessed cannon pin like a lot of the PAM reps. The cyclops is weak and the date font is wrong but it does look the part and only a total PAM head will notice that. It is technically not a 104 because the '6' is incorrect - actually the dial is different. It is more like a 165 but without the bracelet or brushed case - I think - I must admit to being totally confused by Panerais numbering system. Edited May 2, 2006 by steviemeatballs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sssurfer Posted May 2, 2006 Report Share Posted May 2, 2006 Hi, that is not a 104. It seems a 165 without titanium, with a strap instead than a bracelet, with a smaller cyclops, thinner crown, and unconsistent engravings in the caseback. You may find the genuine here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB Posted May 2, 2006 Report Share Posted May 2, 2006 Most would suggest that the 111H/G is a good place to start your Pam collecting. Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sssurfer Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Most would suggest that the 111H/G is a good place to start your Pam collecting. Absolutely. Imleg, if on the other hand you (like me) need the date window in your watch I would also suggest you consider a 104 or a 050. The 050 is probably the most accurate rep around. It does not even suffer of poor date magnification or thin crown. Just, many people do not take it into account because it is 40 mm. That 165 is also unconsistent in its polished finishing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cskent69 Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Absolutely. Imleg, if on the other hand you (like me) need the date window in your watch I would also suggest you consider a 104 or a 050. The 050 is probably the most accurate rep around. It does not even suffer of poor date magnification or thin crown. Just, many people do not take it into account because it is 40 mm. That 165 is also unconsistent in its polished finishing. Hey, I am considering a SS 050. What do you think of Andrew's. Are they all pretty much the same? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sssurfer Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Hey, I am considering a SS 050. What do you think of Andrew's. Are they all pretty much the same? Joshua's and Andrew's seem identical under any respects, even about engravings on their casebacks. Exception made for the individual progressive number -- that is in fact supposed to be different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.