Tribal Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 Hello, This is a small compare from my MBW 1680 Sub with a Genuine one... Let's go.. First Pic is Gen ,second one Rep Enjoy it... RG Tribal
Tribal Posted June 1, 2006 Author Report Posted June 1, 2006 You are doing an absolutely great work my friend... I love that 1680!!! Only thing that could be improved is the pearl - go get a genuine plastic pearl and you are off the socks... I would be very happy to add one of your magnificent pieces to my collection once you have something up for sale... LMK... Thanks Olli, i`m searching for a gen Insert since a long time... When i catch one,i post an upgrade... Thanks for your kind words... P.S. i post next time my Mbw 16610 with some upgrades.. I'm waiting for my tube tapping tool,than the work goes by... Rg Tribal
By-Tor Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 Yep, it's almost indistinguishable from the genuine. Proves how good bases the vintage MBWs are. I echo Repaustria's comment about the pearl. Get a genuine insert or do as I did, lose the pearl.
Tribal Posted June 1, 2006 Author Report Posted June 1, 2006 Yep, it's almost indistinguishable from the genuine. Proves how good bases the vintage MBWs are. I echo Repaustria's comment about the pearl. Get a genuine insert or do as I did, lose the pearl. Hy By-Tor, you are right i need a damm Gen Insert for it... Than it`s perfect.... But i think i solved the problem in a few weeks..... Look here... RG Tribal
Tribal Posted June 1, 2006 Author Report Posted June 1, 2006 Ohhh - I just got a great idea friends... I will try to produce homemade acrylic pearls... and I already know how... Please, Tribal, if you have them on hand or any other people (Randy i look at you) - please post some good resolution shots of the gen pearl without insert! Thanks... In return I'll let you know on my custom pearls if they work - and i think they will - most likely... Ok, sounds good.... But i think its not an easy job.... RG tribal
ubiquitous Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 Hmmmm... I don't have any real side shots... Would this work?
supermanx Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 Those look just like the illimidot I got from ofrie for 10.00
silvio Posted June 3, 2006 Report Posted June 3, 2006 (edited) Nice comparison Tribal. Thanks for sharing. But I'm quite surprised to see that the lughole for the springbar on the gen isn't quite beveled (3rd pic from top). The lughole on your MBW actually looks more convincing. Is that a common problem in a gen? Edited June 3, 2006 by silvio
palpatine Posted June 3, 2006 Report Posted June 3, 2006 Nice comparison Tribal. Thanks for sharing. But I'm quite surprised to see that the lughole for the springbar on the gen isn't quite beveled (3rd pic from top). The lughole on your MBW actually looks more convincing. Is that a common problem in a gen? it looks like that when a wtch was polished several times during the years. every polsihing takes off some of the metal and the lugs get thinner and the bevel gets smaller
silvio Posted June 6, 2006 Report Posted June 6, 2006 it looks like that when a wtch was polished several times during the years. every polsihing takes off some of the metal and the lugs get thinner and the bevel gets smaller That makes sense. I suspect the lughole was scratched by some objects and repolished. Thanks for the explanation Tommy.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now