Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Are We There Yet?


freddy333

Recommended Posts

After ruminating for some time over the idea of upgrading the dial in my 116520 Daytona with one of the dials that comes in some of the newer reps (these have more accurate fonts & subdials), I finally broke down & ordered a new 116520 from Josh about 10 days ago. The watch arrived yesterday and after an uneventful dial swap, I think my 3.5 year old 116520 (with low profile case, modded CGs & gen crown/tube/pushers) now lacks all the obvious rep sins & I could not be happier with the results. So unless someone spots something that I missed, I think I may be pretty close to done. Opinions?

For its coming out, the 2 of us attended a Christmas party last night

pinkjeans0031.jpg

pinkjeans0091.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless somone has the thickness of gen Daytonas memorized, you're good to go! Beautiful piece!

BTW, has anyone managed to cut the feet off of a gen dial and throw it on a sec's @ 6 rep?

Thanks, Archi. I almost did. A few months ago, I bid ($900) on a black gen 116520 dial (I wanted white, but beggars can't be choosers), but it ultimately sold for around $1,900, which was well into the range of irrationality, even for me. But, now, after doing the dial swap from Josh's watch (this is the same model that By-Tor recently reviewed), I am very glad I lost that bid because (from an arm's length, which remains my yardstick for gaging the accuracy of a rep watch) this new rep dial not only lacks all of the visible warts that afflicted previous dials, but it comes so close to the gen as to make another dial upgrade (to the gen) seem silly. Yes, the gen's subdial rings are a bit more matte, the printing is a tiny bit sharper (when viewed through a 4x loupe) & the white gold index surrounds sparkle better than the polished steel surrounds on the rep dial (the differences between polished steel & white gold are quite obvious in the case of larger components like bezels and dauphine hands, but not with tiny parts like these). When viewed in the wild (and not under store display lights), I just cannot justify the additional cost & trouble for the truly meager improvements a gen dial might provide.

Unfortunately, the cases on these new Daytona reps are still pretty inaccurate. The CGs are too wide and misshapen (though these can be improved), the rehaut is too deep & the case body is noticeably thicker than the gen, which makes the watch sit too high on your wrist. My case is still thicker than the gen, but only by a mm or so, so the watch looks quite normal when on my wrist (Josh's case on left, mine on right)

casecomparisons20031.jpg

I should also mention that the movement is slightly different (more finished/decorated) than any of the 3 previous secs at 6 Asian 7750s I have worked with (so this may be another upgrade since Ziggy's last 7750 review update a few months ago). But since my original movement is one of the few that are still running (and keeping COSC time), I decided to keep this new movement as a backup. But it is definitely a looker compared to the movement in my watch (though I did swap the rotors since that is not likely to affect the movement's longevity & it is almost a dead-ringer for the gen rotor (except for the single fixing screw (there are 3 screws in the gen's rotor))

6a.jpg

(Photo from Josh's website)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it. Or, at least I can tolerate it well. 1, 3 & 9 are slightly twisted. So am I. (Actually 1 might be the camera angle...)

I think it is either the camera angle or the way light reflects off the metal surrounds. I just used a straightedge to check the alignment of all 6 pairs of markers (12/6, 1/7, 2/8, 3/9, 4/10 & 5/11) & they are dead on. But I am pretty twisted too, so who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could swear 9 & 3 look like they are rotated about 1/2 a degree...

I think it is the camera angle with 1 though, making the "boat" tail look like is listing toward 2.

Of course, if you listen to me too much, I'll only end up driving you nuts with minutiae...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job Freddy!

It's a shame these modern Daytonas still have so many flaws left in rep form.

Some friends of mine have gens and it is just not possible for me to get away with a rep... especially with the bezel height and overall thickness.

Here is my gen dial that I've bought to put in my rep:

tarcza1dc2.jpg

tarcza2wr2.jpg

tarcza3ij1.jpg

Finally sold a rep and decided to keep the dial in case my gen 116520 that I will get sooner or later comes with black dial and I'd like to swap.

Some pics of my old 116520 rep...

27020-679.jpg

27020-680.jpg

Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, and unless your Daytona owing friends are also TZ regulars, I seriously doubt that they would spot your rep Daytona. Rolex owners (except those who are TZ regulars or watchmakers) tend to know nothing about their watch beyond the name on the dial.

One of the differences I have noted between the gen dial & the one I just installed is that the subdial rings on the gen are composed of about 12 ridges (you can almost count them in your pictures, but it is easier to do when you have the dial in your hand and view it through a loupe), while there are only 8 or 9 ridges in the subdial rings on the rep dial (my original rep dial has 14 or 15 ridges).

If you do not mind my asking, what did you pay for your gen dial? You can PM me if you would rather not post the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up