Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

PVD Comparison


fishgodeep

Recommended Posts

I just wanted to share these pics for comparison and hopefully start some debate with expert input.

I have very little expert knowledge on the correct shade of PVD for A series PAM's - but these 2 are completely different.

The PAM009 as shown recently was done by Rolli - who I know has researched long and hard to achieve the anthracite gray finish on the case set and buckle.

The PAM028 was purchased from member Lolos back in February and has just returned from "Rehab" in Canada - it looks like it had overdosed on "abuse" whilst in the hands of it's previous owner.

The case has been PVD's by Jack at International Watch Works - (http://www.angelfire.com/blues/andcameysiww/Firstpage.html)

But I don't think this is the "Stealth Max" finish that he normally does.

The quandary I have is that the 28 set also came with what I believe is an OEM A series 2 screw buckle - which is in the exact same colour PVD finish. I assumed this was a SS one originally and went with the case to IWW.

The second quandary is the OEM crown (purchased from enesefe on Ebay) - this has the same "blue" colour nuances as the case set and buckle - although I purchased this separately and Ziggy installed.

So I am no left wondering if the A series buckle is in the original OEM PVD - and Lolos had the case set matched to it.

The OEM crown - which by deduction must have been made originally for PAM 28 - is such a good match to the case

I know which one I prefer and think is correct - but could do with some input.

I have many photos from Rolli of 202a that look to be the same colour as the Jack IWW - and photos of 009/004 that look exactly like Rolli's PVD...

What do you guys and gals think ?

:fish:

P1020092.jpg

P1020091.jpg

P1020089.jpg

P1020084.jpg

P1020083.jpg

P1020096.jpg

P1020094.jpg

P1020093.jpg

P1020062.jpg

P1020070.jpg

P1020066.jpg

P1020065.jpg

P1020064.jpg

P1020063.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

S-

They both look great. As you know it is all about the bead blasting methodology and chemical compound applied. The older PAM's were done at a time when the state of the art technology was TiN or TiAln (can't remember which is which). Both finishes are inferior in durability to more contemporary DLC which is what is on the 195 and looks very different. In terms of flexibility to manipulate color I believe Tin is what is used by architectural firms seeking to mimic existing pieces. It is also what is used as the base for durable gold plating. The problem with comparisons is that pictures can vary dramatically based on external lighting and flash used. And to make it more confusing no two batches of PVD are exactly the same which is why you can see differences from one watch to another. What I will say is that if one case matches up better to the gen crown that is probably the better coat. Having said that both coatings look beyond reproach. Jack's stealth max looks very different and is $600 including bead blasting. And by the way I have several PVD crowns from the A and B automatics and they vary as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They certainly both look great, congrats. It's very difficult to rate 'PVD' from pics and I don't own a genuine A series example but I have a local friend who has a gen 4A. For what it's worth your 09 looks closer to his genuine 4A, at least from your pics but it's difficult to argue with the gen crown. I don't know if the finish on the A&B series handwids was the same as the autos but looking back through a library of photos that I've collected the autos seem to be darker. This may simply be the pics though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So hard to tell from pics, and as kruzer pointed out the PVD varries even within gens. I'm pf the thinking that our best bet is to "rep" the beadblasting of a gen sample and then PVD using the method used on the original, e.g. see if you can find someone to beadblast as per a gen crown, CG, case and then have the piece PVD'd using whatever method OP used on the specific watch (TiN, TiAln, or DLC as the case may be).

One misconception I can lay to rest is that the kind of beadblasting done would neccessitate a certain method of PVD application. Beadblasting is beadblasting. PVD is PVD. Each effects the final look in its own way but they are two discrete parts of the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gents - thanks for your input.

I agree on the photos ...tried many angles under the same light to show the shades etc.

I think the crown match to the case on the 28 is clearly visible though.

What it doesn't show as well is the difference vs Rolli's 009 - the 28 has a distinct "blue steel" (Zoolander??!) hue that is disconcerting on its own until you compare to OEM images - again could be trickery of the lighting.

If this was a competition ...I think Rolli's would win

Price wise- Rolli's comes in a shade under $500 all in - Jack's is $600+ I believe

Any one else got aftermarket PVD to show please ....28 especially so.

Cheers

:fish:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

heres a picture of mine for comparison

pam4pav9910qk.jpg

i always thought the pvd was a bit too dark. Honestly i was wondering if it even was real pvd, because of the dark colour

btw. pic is from previous owner fitch from trc

mods done are

River pam001

lello crown

jimmy crownguard

recessed pin upgrade

genuine pvd (according to same specs as pam004 pvd coating)

PAV0099

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yours looks similar. Prior to Rolli the only aftermarket PVD opportunities I was aware of were Jack at IWCC who has changed his coating, the original Palpatine DLC, a couple of pieces coming out of Australia through Ajoesmith/David and Finepics. Palpatine actually went to the trouble to find an OEM supplier to PAM. But the maufacturer had stopped doing Ti processes by the time hw got to him. He had moved on to DLC. I had a piece done that way but it was way off. What we didn't know is that it is most likely the DLC on the gen 195. I suspect Jay would remember the name. Finepics had a good coater but the guy definitely had good and bad runs and ultimately they stopped doing watchs. I have a Bell and Ross with the Ajoesmith/David PVD coating. The color is good for a PAM but the beadblasting is off so you ended up with a flatter finish relative to gen A and B PAM's. I did mine through Finepics a couple of years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up