PeteTO Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 (edited) here are my first attempts at pics of the sub i recieved from josh.... pug helped me late into the night to make em work!!! thanks again pug!! im still tryin to take more pics as well as some comparison to my canal st sub shots enjoy! Pete Edited August 4, 2006 by PeteTO
Guest sub4me Posted July 29, 2006 Report Posted July 29, 2006 Looks nice. I'll bet you'll be wearing that one alot, at least until your next one arrives. LOL
PeteTO Posted July 29, 2006 Author Report Posted July 29, 2006 lol currently lookin at an Explorer I from josh..... Pete
jnkay Posted July 30, 2006 Report Posted July 30, 2006 From the pictures, I wouldn't know it wasn't genuine. Can't see the pearl to clearly, but the dial, rehaut depth and crystal look genuine. And for a "classic," there are no lug holes and the end link appears solid. I never got the impression from the pictures on Josh's website that his classic sub looked this accurate. Am I missing something that the picture hides?
TJGladeRaider Posted July 30, 2006 Report Posted July 30, 2006 here are my first attempts at pics of the sub i recieved from josh.... pug helped me late into the night to make em work!!! thanks again pug!! im still tryin to take more pics as well as some comparison to my canal st sub shots enjoy! Pete I don't think you have the watch you think you have - but maybe it's just the pics have me confused. I have every Sub/SD Joshua sells, and several of each of the best ones, and I believe that you have his best contemporary sub with the new case and crown guards. If so, it is not the "classic" sub that he was selling on his photobucket site as his best for so long (although that was real nice and I have some of those), but a new style I bought a few of when he first sourced it a few months ago. I could be mistaken, so you better ask Joshua, but I have them all right here. On his "Classic" from Photobucket, the crown guards don't look good, and you'll notice his pics show the stem out. His newest version of that watch has much better crown guards - I think he upgraded you. It has seemed odd to me that his new case didn't get much commentary - I guess it was overlooked because he came out with his "perfect" series almost immediately after that. If yours is what I think it is, it is one of my favorites in the contemporary, no lug hole design. Bill
TJGladeRaider Posted July 30, 2006 Report Posted July 30, 2006 I don't think you have the watch you think you have - but maybe it's just the pics have me confused. If yours is what I think it is, it is one of my favorites in the contemporary, no lug hole design. Bill Just consulted with Josh, you have been upgraded to this watch Your Watch If, for any reason, you think you prefer the old one - you just let me know. Bill
jnkay Posted July 30, 2006 Report Posted July 30, 2006 I don't think you have the watch you think you have - but maybe it's just the pics have me confused. I have every Sub/SD Joshua sells, and several of each of the best ones, and I believe that you have his best contemporary sub with the new case and crown guards. If so, it is not the "classic" sub that he was selling on his photobucket site as his best for so long (although that was real nice and I have some of those), but a new style I bought a few of when he first sourced it a few months ago. I could be mistaken, so you better ask Joshua, but I have them all right here. On his "Classic" from Photobucket, the crown guards don't look good, and you'll notice his pics show the stem out. His newest version of that watch has much better crown guards - I think he upgraded you. It has seemed odd to me that his new case didn't get much commentary - I guess it was overlooked because he came out with his "perfect" series almost immediately after that. If yours is what I think it is, it is one of my favorites in the contemporary, no lug hole design. Bill I haven't seen a better modern sub. I also am surprised this hasn't received more attention, because it apears to have corrected glaring flaws that members point always out. Other opinions.....?
TJGladeRaider Posted July 30, 2006 Report Posted July 30, 2006 I haven't seen a better modern sub. I also am surprised this hasn't received more attention, because it apears to have corrected glaring flaws that members point always out. Other opinions.....? I'll leave the expert critiques to the experts - which I am not. However, while I do not have the expertise, I do have the watches themselves sitting here in front of me. To me, I keep Subs/SDs straight in my mind as vintage, classic (lug holes), and contemporary (no lug holes). I am more quality than price conscious - I cannot tell you anything about the inexpensive ones. The contemporary sub that this guy bought, is exceptionally nice, and an obvious improvement over Joshua's prior model. I don't argue with experts, but if this isn't the most bang for the buck as contemporary subs go, someone needs to show me why. I have the contemporary MBW equivalent sitting right here too. I'd be anxious to have our experts compare it to this watch, just as they come off the shelf. Bill
PeteTO Posted July 31, 2006 Author Report Posted July 31, 2006 just got back from campin....darn perfect clones site is down!! what watch is this? i just ordered the one off his site? what link is that to the PC site? im all confused lol im gonna take some more pics of this one a bit later tonight.... Pete
PeteTO Posted July 31, 2006 Author Report Posted July 31, 2006 (edited) ** Edited August 4, 2006 by PeteTO
By-Tor Posted August 1, 2006 Report Posted August 1, 2006 From this far the Sub looks great... but could you post bigger pictures of your watch from different angles? It's quite hard to say anything from those small pics, they're almost like thumbnails.
PeteTO Posted August 1, 2006 Author Report Posted August 1, 2006 really? they are showing up big for me....maybe im doin it wrong im just linkin off my photobucket... Pete
Linder Posted August 3, 2006 Report Posted August 3, 2006 LOL, those should be large enough Very nice sub.
miquel Posted August 3, 2006 Report Posted August 3, 2006 Every time I see one of these modern 16610 subs, I want to get one. Especially now with all the cheaper "near-perfect" ones out there. This one I like. Nanuq ... help ... I need some acrylic ... awhh <falls off deep end of rep collection syndrome>
manuel Posted August 4, 2006 Report Posted August 4, 2006 wow, looks like mbw to me! Very beautiful. You guys are seeing da best sub. No joking! Why do you say classic? I don't see lugholes. Please someone to enlight me.
PeteTO Posted August 4, 2006 Author Report Posted August 4, 2006 this is the one straight off joshs site...$188 bucks Pete
manuel Posted August 5, 2006 Report Posted August 5, 2006 this is the one straight off joshs site...$188 bucks Pete Yeah, I know its from Joshua, but it looks very close to the real deal. Wear it well.
PeteTO Posted August 5, 2006 Author Report Posted August 5, 2006 Yeah, I know its from Joshua, but it looks very close to the real deal. Wear it well. thanks!!! i will Pete
Tribal Posted September 6, 2006 Report Posted September 6, 2006 Hello, Nice Sub at all... But i think the date mag is too far on the right side... Rehaut looks damm good.... For the money a good choice.. Wear it well.... RG tribal
bigmouth Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 Hello, Nice Sub at all... But i think the date mag is too far on the right side... Rehaut looks damm good.... For the money a good choice.. Wear it well.... RG tribal I think the date mag is allright when you see the other pics. I just ordered 1 BTW. Can't wait
DWSmoot Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 (edited) I think the date mag "is" to far right. I viewing a gen, there appears to be second marks showing to the right of the date mag form straight on shot... Edited September 23, 2006 by DWSmoot
DWSmoot Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 (edited) I think the date mag "is" to far right. I viewing a gen, there appears to be second marks showing to the right of the date mag form straight on shot...Take a look at a gen photo... Edited September 23, 2006 by DWSmoot
Tribal Posted September 25, 2006 Report Posted September 25, 2006 Yes it is,i compared to Gen one... Too far to the right... But a nice watch at all... Rg Tribal
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now