cib0rgman Posted August 3, 2006 Report Posted August 3, 2006 (edited) Maybe this already has been discuss in another thread, but I really want to know if he is using pictures of genuine, even the hand are stack correctly, Maybe I am missing something but the watch looks perfect. http://shopping.e-conveni.net/item_info.ht..._id=707793& Can someone comment about this dealer and dealing with him? Thanks Edited August 3, 2006 by cib0rgman
cib0rgman Posted August 3, 2006 Author Report Posted August 3, 2006 I keep looking at the pictures even the bezel insert look like a genuine.
By-Tor Posted August 3, 2006 Report Posted August 3, 2006 (edited) That's the infamous "new batch" GMT that looks nothing like the genuine. Just look at the miniscule coronet and ROLEX font under it (for starters) The bezel font is WAYYYY too thick as well. Not to mention the cg's that are awful. Bad, bad rep... one of the worst "new batch" Rolly reps available... Edited August 3, 2006 by By-Tor
cib0rgman Posted August 3, 2006 Author Report Posted August 3, 2006 (edited) That's the infamous "new batch" GMT that looks nothing like the genuine. Just look at the miniscule coronet and ROLEX font under it (for starters) The bezel font is WAYYYY too thick too. Bad, bad rep... Besides that what else is, it just need a Dial replacement. thank By-Tor Now that I take a better look, the CG looks weird like the Sub CG Edited August 3, 2006 by cib0rgman
By-Tor Posted August 3, 2006 Report Posted August 3, 2006 (edited) Besides that what else is, it just need a Dial replacement. thank By-Tor Don't go even near this watch... and I don't understand that our dealers even sell this shit. The only thing correct in this watch is the hand stack (GMT hand placed over the hour hand correctly). But according to Joshua even this arrangement has given tons of reliability problems with this model. Here's a small list of problems for you (did this a while back when someone asked the same questions about it): Edit: Apparently they have fixed the date font for the newer versionl. I've seen this rep with the thick (and non-centered) font. It's still very inaccurate rep. Edited August 3, 2006 by By-Tor
cib0rgman Posted August 3, 2006 Author Report Posted August 3, 2006 Don't go even near this watch... and I don't understand that our dealers even sell this [censored]. The only thing correct in this watch is the hand stack (GMT hand placed over the hour hand correctly). But according to Joshua even this arrangement has given tons of reliability problems with this model. Here's a small list of problems for you (did this a while back when someone asked the same questions about it): Edit: Apparently they have fixed the date font for the newer versionl. I've seen this rep with the thick (and non-centered) font. It's still very inaccurate rep. Thanks I do appreciate that. I have my eyes on a Gen, Still looking on ebay and timezome
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now