Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

b16a2

Member
  • Posts

    3,549
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by b16a2

  1. It's an interesting point. I believe the only reason that it is considered more sensitive to call anyone other than a white person by a 'politically incorrect' name is due to the history associated with it.

    By that I mean historically, there were massive racism issues where certain races were greatly surpressed by white people. Therefore, because the world has worked towards trying to improve that position, anyone using a 'politically incorrect' word against another race is seen as a racist (in some peoples eyes).

    However, because the white race hasn't historically been surpressed as a race (ok there are examples of it, eg Zimbabwe), but in general calling a white person a 'honky' doesn't have as much of a historical impliction, and therefore it is less 'policitcally sensitive' to do so.

    I myself have no problem in calling people black, white, asian etc... I would refrain from using words that are seen as derogatory, not because it wouldn't be politically correct in doing so, but merely because of common courtesy and politeness.

    I do feel that there is a general feeling that there is some kind of positive discrimination (discrimination isn't the right word, but racism doesn't sounds right) emerging, but I have plenty of black friends who in actual fact don't have a problem being caled black etc... because that's what they are. It is interesting to note that I find more white people find it outrageous to call people black etc...

  2. I've also just taken delivery of a Ceramic GMT2. Il get snapping this afternoon and post some pictures.

    It is a really nice watch, especially when you get it outside in the sun, the bezel and the dial can be seen in all it's glory in bright sunlight!

    Having owned the Submariner, the maxi dial looks a little OTT in comparison, but I'm sure it's something Il get used to.

    In all, it's a great replica!

  3. Not at all, it was only on the close up that I noticed it.

    I play tennis myself, and cannot imagine wearing a watch whilst playing....especially something of that size! It's similar to Serena Williams, she plays wearing a necklace and dangly earings...now I couldn't imagine wearing my dangly earings whilst playing tennis! :)

  4. Zigmeister did a full tear down of the movement, and found that the main problem with the mvoement was the state that is comes in from the factory.

    If you have it serviced, and graphite treatment applied to the central gear, there is no reason why it shouldn't last another five years. Then get it serviced again and it should last another five years :)

  5. Not sure, I found the pictures from an ebay sale, they look very dark blue to me :)

    I thought there was a forum member with a genuine of this exact watch, but I can't find the thread anywhere......

    It was me :)

    I want to post some pictures, but the people in the know at Photobucket have said I have exceeded my bandwidth until later this week :(

    The markers and hands are indeed blue, similar to the IWC Porto blue hands and numerals.

  6. With regards to the Breitling Bentley's, the best version to go for is the 6.75 big date.

    They do lack AR (double AR) but this can be coated if you want to add an extra dimension of authenticity to it.

    Here is a link to one of the dealers, but you can get them cheaper elsewhere;

    http://www.jpc8118.com/bl02060-bentley-date-chrono-brown-a7750-sec3-28800-p-3682.html

    The smaller 44mm has a rehaut width issue, as in it's too wide (the part of the dial on the outside that turns, kind of like a side wall)

    On the 48.7 and Motors T, the date wheel is sunken, and there is no 30second Chrono.

    There are flaws on all fo the Bentley reps, and it's just about picking the ones you can live with. The 6.7 is the most accurate of them all though.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up