thogaa

Was that on WTC or Columbia?

Still wearing the master

Smokin'

This IS better than having a family

Maybe I should seek some kind of help. It now amounts to 14 reps in one big haul. Nothing in the mailbox today though

Stop it

I could just put a nato strap on it and let my 5 year old son wear it one day at kindergarten. That'll ad app 50 years almost instantly

It'll most likely get so much wrist time that aging happens naturally

And the order goes to.... Chris

Agree. 39 mm is not a lot

That's new to me. I see that ETZ have the 6538 on the website. They look alike to me. I wonder what the difference would be (other than $150)

I ordered a 5508 rep from a trusty dealer yesterday. But the factory doesn't make them anymore. Does this mean I cannot obtain a 5508 - IMHO the only true 007ograph?

Bhold the SLR I saw this one last year outside Beverly Plaza

interesting figure 99%

It just keeps getting better I just HAD to have a 5508 rep - the real 007ograph

Really? Well, as I mentioned there are lots of flaws on this if you review it as a rep - but it's perfect in its own way

I got it from Andrew Lume - Yup there's lots of lume

Mesh would surely look great too. I wonder if anyone does an Omega Buckle to suit my strap?

And at $198 its hard to resist

No problem. Here are some (still from the mobile) A bit hard to do macros with a Sony-Ericsson C901 - But the crown IS nice

The winning bet is the Seamaster 300 vintage rep

My very very first rep has arrived. The Seamaster 300 vintage No-date from TT. (OMG0111C) I immediately put an old leather strap on it. The case back is probably the biggest giveaway Excellent lume. This thing really lights up like a xmas tree And sort of a wrist shot The pictures are rubbish I know - made with my mobile phone in a hurry. The protective plastic was still on the crystal when I made the pics. It's a lot clearer when that’s peeled off IMHO the S300 rep is not very close to original - more to be seen as a "new" watch with kind of old "heritage". A collector would easily spot the various flaws but I don't give a dame. I think it's a great timepiece. A small issue is the two stage pull out of the crown. A bit unnecessary when it hasn't got a date. Maybe it's in there somewhere behind the dial? It seems well made and I'm sure it'll get a lot of wrist time here

I've seen a few reps of the vintage sub where the no date versions says "OYSTER PERPETUAL DATE" on the dial

I decided on a major plunge

I've got a 1665 vint SD ETA on the way from Andrew...