Eiderdaus

haha,might be a waste but most of all it will be an experience if good or bad who knows but 400 for the lessons learned , not me

there are more than 2 pics. But i am curious who will be the first to spend the 400$ as an experience

i have a gen cracked tritium pearl, if you are interested shoot a pm

I thought that the gen dial will Be too Small for a mbw Case?

IMHO the case is not more worth than 150$. The expected cost on rebuilding the watch would exceed the value of the replica.

Two cheap reps thats all.

the bezel might won´t fit but the insert should ?

Hi guys, want to share some pics with you. Today I received my latest acquisition, a genuine Rolex 116710LN GMT II ceramic bezel + insert. I was very unsure because the seller on ebay had only 1 transaction and I guess this was the reason why no other was jumping on it. It is the bezel (no bezel assembly) and the insert + protection. I have to say, this insert is so much different from all rep ceramic inserts I have seen so far. This might comes from the difference of real full ceramic construction and ceramic plating only as per rep. The pics can´t take the the full impression of the quality and apperance unfortunately. Sorry that I don´t have a better camera. If anyone is experienced in mounting a gen bezel on the 116710LN please contact me. I am worry about that this won´t fit a rep 116710...might only use the insert. thanks for looking Eider

if asked or not, if you post it you ask for it

what about the TW best yacht master ? has anyone ever purchased this and wrote a review ?

Nice pictures and I understand that you are proud and happy but do you own a gen to compare ? When I read this is like, this is like gen, and it feels like gen and that is like gen.....the rehaut is far away from gen and the "effect" is only on tw best and supremes and it´s absolutely wrong. the engraving might be alligned but it´s fuzzy when you look from some certain angles. the engraving between the lugs 16610 is incorrect because it must be a T16610 case as this has no lug holes....ok, who will notice with a bracelet but it´s not coreect as per gen some more other anal stuff....but yes, bk is a master in his work but he can only be as good as the material that he works with. the tw best is maybe the best rep case (i say case) to build a very accurate rep of the 16610 (maybe better than a wm9 and maybe better in some areas as the sean case) but I don´t see the comparism that a bezel turns like a gen....when the bezel size at all differs from the gen ;-) but thumbs up for a great rep and a nice catch

i washed my watch with warm water and mild soap, now i have soap bubbles in my watch under the crystal....can I claim a new watch from CC as they told to do so ?

As I said...this will be mine here the pics. unfortunately it´s not for me.....my fiance will be very happy

i think that nice piece on the right is mine

bought from jimmy a HBB AB II, great watch, fast shipping and good communication. AsI talked to other members and none I know had received a crappy watch as someone else above said. edit: he was shipping to Germany within 4 days without any custom problems ! that was awesome

and maybe some of you experienced this as well, the SEL are too long on the supreme or tw best. comparism on the left side sean bracelet - right side gen left side noob - right side gen left side sean - right side noob so the SEL are too long and therefore the noob SEL has a better seat on the case. You would need to modify the SEL on tw best and supreme bracelet to have a proper seat. I sanded this on one other bracelet down so it works now. and what i realised, the SEL on my gen are build of one piece, the reps are not

on top is the sean case, in the middle the recently bought pt supreme without rehaut engraving and on the bottom the pt supreme with rehaut engraving. all 3 cases have the same case engraving between the top lugs org rolex desing 16610 this is not correct for this case as this case is a 16610T case without drilled lugholes here is the wm9 v3 engraving little freestyle engraving, its off but it´s complete. for comparism here my gen 16610LN

@zeleni, i don´t know what you are talking about, the first picture on the left shows the sean case and on the right the supreme (m series, non rehaut engraved, so no wm9 v1) high yeah, i think the confusions came from that nobody really knows what is a wm9 v1 or not and by-tor called the wm9 v1 as tw best. pt claims it a wm9 v1 although his models, with or without rehaut engravings, are all m -serialz. i think it´s the same as tw best case. on my supremes the tubes accept gen crowns, crystal and gen insert (not snap in tightly). the sean case bezel seems to be to small for gen inserts, i can´t snap them in. btw sean case is an m-serial too

highoeyazmuhudee, I have two versions of the pt supreme, one with and one without rehaut engraving, the 1 first picture shows the pt supreme without rehaut engraving.

lol, if it would be like that i would be happy. but you should know that pt never was selling wm9 v2. always nice advices, go modd the watch with those gen parts and v2 and v3 parts. tell the asking guy where to find afterwards

actually it´s the same watch that bk uses for his tw best methinks (could be wrong), bought one a year ago and one few days ago, two different watches to me.

Just because you are not happy that doesn´t mean the rest of us ain´t, or shouldn´t have to.... what is BS in my comment ? You think you are the only one to write down a valid opinion ? relax angry old man

had no problem with sean so far, what do you expect.spoonfeeding and pampering the entire way ?

hi, here the wm9 v3 lv the PT supreme, wm9 v1 and the tw best

compared to my gen, that looks quite impressive. I will do the comp when the case hits my place