calatrava

Okay, I got Puretime to send some additional QC photos of the watch. Two questions: 1. Does the rehaut look centered (seems okay to me, but a second opinion is always appreciated)? 2. Does the bottom left corner of the AP logo okay, it looks like there might be a slight blemish there (might only be noticeable on the macro shots, but not in real life)?

Hi, I've just received QC photos for a AP Royal Oak Jumbo, does everything look okay? In particular, do the bezel screws and the dial alignment look acceptable? This is the watch I ordered: http://www.puretimewatch.com/product/royal-oak-jumbo-39mm-ultimate-edition-ss-black-dial-on-ss-bracelet/ Thanks for looking, and for any feedback and comments. This is the timegrapher result, -9s/day, 294 degree amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error.

Yup, it's me. I did notice the very slight opening at the top, but I'll probably try to tighten it up when I receive it. As some members mentioned on RWI, the serial number is quite unique, particularly since I'm Chinese... 8 is considered a lucky number in Cantonese, since it sounds like fortune.

Hi, this is my first Pam, so I would appreciate any feedback from all the Pam experts on the forum. It is a Pam 111M from Puretimewatch. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Yes, I had a good experience with them, no real complaints. The site again is: http://www.marvellousreplica.com/Product_Detail.aspx?ProductID=200910031503 They ship from China by EMS, and arrived in CONUS just fine.

Funny you ask, I just placed an order for a AP Royal Oak Jumbo... Here are some more photos of the Patrimony Chronograph. They're actually the QC photos I received, since they're exceptionally well taken.

I also have a Noob Rolex GMT IIC, and in practice, I tend to rotate between that and the VC Overseas. If I wore the entire first row on a regular rotation, people would start thinking that I'm getting paid too much...

Amazing replica, and wonderful photos.

Thanks, the Patrimony chronograph was from: http://www.marvellousreplica.com/Product_Detail.aspx?ProductID=200910031503

Hi, just wanted to share a photo of my collection of Patek Philippe, Vacheron Constantin, and Jaeger-LeCoultre replicas. In order (left to right, top to bottom): 1. Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Tourbillon (fantasy) 2. Vacheron Constantin Patrimony Traditionelle Chronograph 3. Vacheron Constantin Overseas 4. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711-1A 5. Patek Philippe Calatrava 5127G 6. Patek Philippe Calatrava 5119G 7. Patek Philippe Calatrava 3520DG 8. Patek Philippe Calatrava 5120-1G

I haven't really measured the accuracy, but I did do a power reserve test, and it lasted about 46 hours.

If by dents, you're referring to the mark on the bottom right lug, this is supposed to be a hallmark (indicating the purity of the white gold), but it is poorly done, and just looks like a blemish in the finishing. I have one of these as well, and I just ended up filing it off. I have two of these watches, which I purchased off Taobao, and they are quartz based. They're quite nicely done, but I had the chance to handle a real Patek Calatava, and at least the one I looked at had a very nice curved Sapphire crystal, whereas this replica has a flat sapphire crystal. The caseback on this replica is quite accurate, it is mostly plain, except for some very small engraved text at the bottom saying 3520DG. You know, the strap on yours looks fairly decent, much better than the ones I received.

I'm a bit skeptical of the site, since they seem to using photos of genuine watches.

This is the closest looking gen I could find, which is the Hublot Big Bang Minute Repeater Tourbillon Watch. I feel that the replica has a nicer looking front and back, in the sense that the skeletonization is much more interesting and extensive. Video of the Minute Repeater

I'm not usually a Hubolt Big Bang fan, but this Tourbillon version is very nicely done.

I would be interested to know where to find the best Royal Oak Jumbo replica.

I've checked with Seagull USA, and their new microrotor movement isn't scheduled to appear in a commercial watch until the end of the year, and it'll be one of their more expensive models. I'm guessing $400 or so for a Seagull branded watch, so probably a comparable amount of money for a decent replica of the Patek Calatrava based on the same movement.

It is about 42mm without the crown, but the curvature of the lugs help wrap the watch around one's wrist. As for repair, that's still a big unknown. However, I imagine that many of the issues one might encounter do not actually require servicing the tourbillon complication itself, so if a watchsmith is willing to work on the watch, with the caveat that he leaves the tourbillon cage alone, I think most common issues could be resolved.

This is a video of the tourbillon in action. Note the screws on the balance wheel, which are visible on the HD version of the video: JLC Master Tourbillon Video

Sorry, I meant coaxial-tourbillon.

The writeup was sent to me from Alex Lee at Perpetual watch, but I figured it would be good to share it. Hopefully my new JLC Master Tourbillon, which is based on the PTS (Hangzhou) movement is more robust than the first batch of chinese tourbillons.

That is a bit overpriced. Perpetual watches used to carry an automatic tourbillon, and I think it was approximately $1000, and they are said to have impeccable finishing and service. For a limited time Seagull USA has the 818.360 Tourbillon for $2600. Contact them directly if you're interested, since the pricing is limited to stock on hand. This seems to use a newer Seagull carrousel-tourbillon movement.

Alex Lee at Perpetual Watch is highly regarded on the chinese mechanical forum at Watchuseek, and makes some wonderfully crafted watches which use various chinese tourbillon movements. If you're looking for a good quality and reliable non-replica tourbillon, he has my recommendation. http://www.perpetual-watch.com/ In any case, he has done a comparison study of the various tourbillon movements which are available, and I wanted to share this with the other forum members. What follows is due to Alex: I am a Blancpain fan right from the beginning, my collection wouldn't be possible without its influence. Blancpain created the Carrousel-Tourbillon in the late 90's and I have loved it ever since. I was always curious why 9 out of 10 (10 out of 10 most of the time) of watch lovers would prefer the Breguet's coaxial Tourbillon over the Carrousel-Tourbillon. Blancpain adapted its Tourbillon from the original carrousel construction for its more visible display of the escapement instead of being underneath the balance wheel as in Breguet type. The Carrousel-Tourbillon also can achieve with a thinner movement thickness because the escapement is in line with the balance wheel. When I finally made my own Tourbillon collection, my first Tourbillon had to be the Carrousel-Tourbillon employing the TianJin’s ST8000 caliber. Then later I introduced the automatic Tourbillon DG8101 into my collection, something happened to me almost seemingly without a trace, I was miraculously getting attracted by the coaxial Tourbillon, the more I looked at it, the more I was captured by it. Since the Carrousel-Tourbillon’s balance wheel is smaller than the one used in coaxial type, the coaxial Tourbillon’s bigger balance wheel in fact is much more impressive to be looked at. In addition, the flying Tourbillon is relatively more vulnerable to be damaged by accidental impacts while the coaxial type is very solid being mounted on the same main pinion. Try log onto my website and go to the VIDEO webpage, do yourself a favor, watch both ST8000 & DG8101 & the recent added SH F-8’s videos at least 3-5 times, you might experience what I had experienced and might join the others as a Breguet's coaxial type Tourbillon fan too. The anatomy on all Chinese Tourbillons HangZhou HZ (PTS) Tourbillon FD3091 series, the carriage is not very attractive, like a pigeon, and their new FD3900 is coaxial, manual winding and off-center hands display, the beating rate of 28’800 bph, not 21’600 bph. I do have a problem with the day/night display, very ridiculous for any Tourbillon I must say. HZ FD3091 HZ FD3900 ShangHai SH Tourbillon, I like its display of seconds hand on top of the carriage, its hands are center-axis & manual winding. One of the most expensive Tourbillons since every makers had a drastic 60% reduction 2 years ago but not Shanghai. The movement back is not very impressive, too simple. The SH had already successfully made an Orbital Tourbillon and the Double Tourbillon, the Triple Tourbillon is on its way. My latest automatic Tourbillon AT series featuring the newest SH F-8 movement, by far the best Chinese Tourbillon in terms of the Tourbillon type, beating rate, with power reserve & day-date features added, and most of all, the SH F-8 ‘s price is now more approachable than its manual predecessor. LiaoNing LN Tourbillon as shown in the BHI ‘s pic, The first generation Chinese Tourbillon, has been flooding the market ever since. Personally I think it's the worst. The carriage looks like a freak, it is manual winding, center-axis hands display and very inexpensive, the BHI (British Horological Institute) Tourbillon is selling it at less than 400 pounds on the web. BeiJing BJ Tourbillon, the carriage looks real odd as well as the back, it is center-axis hands display and manual winding, the price is as expensive as the SH since both had avoided the Tourbillon movement’s price war which led to a massive price cuts. Many experts view the BJ & SH are much better than the others, I suspect mostly because of their high prices, but I personally think they are not that far better than the rest. The BJ has proven its supremacy achieving making the first Chinese Minute Repeater Tourbillon and most recently the bi-axial 3D Tourbillon as well. TianJin ST Tourbillon series is certainly one of the best, also the price is very attractive, but not their branded watches seagull , way over-priced I must say. The ST8000 is very reliable according to my over 3 years’ personal experience, both by using & wearing it. The movement back is the most impressive one among all the others. Although the new automatic ST8000 is available, ST8002ZG is in fact ST8000 with an additional rotor for self-winding, now seagull is only selling this caliber with the 18-carat gold models only, the stainless steel model won't be available any time soon. On the other hand, the ST8000 offers an attractive price, although off-center hands display, but with my improper-proportioned hands, you might not notice it at all. The advantage of manual winding is, no obstruction to view the carriage from the back, automatic rotor will always get in the way at 6 o'clock position, in fact, all major prestigious Swiss Tourbillons are manual winding. An update on seagull, they have now included a coaxial Tourbillon in their collection, again available in precious metal models only. Recently I have introduced another seagull Tourbillon caliber ST8001 with added Power Reserve & Date, the movement costs 2/3 more than ST8000. Personally I would prefer ST8000, again for the same reason, the Tourbillon carriage is the major attraction and should be left alone. GuangDong DG Tourbillon, it was previously employed in my automatic Tourbillon series, the first ever Chinese made automatic Tourbillon, currently the only automatic coaxial Chinese Tourbillon has registered a patent in Switzerland. The DG8101 is a typical Breguet coaxial type and is often called center Tourbillon. 8 out of 10 watch lovers will prefer it over the Carrousel-Tourbillon. You are likely to find a similar DG8101 Tourbillon movement by other brands with added day-date displays (DG8000). Since DG8101 is off-center hands display, with added day-date subdials on top, from an aesthetic point of view, I find it very awkward, the Tourbillon’s carriage is the ultimate major attraction and should be left alone. We had stopped employed this caliber from our collection ever since the ShangHai F-8 AT Tourbillons were introduced in earlier 2010.

The Cartier Tank is nice, as is the JLC Reverso, but I have not seen a good replica of either watch.

Thanks for the kind words. More photos, I replaced the replica black leather strap with a dark brown Gucci genuine crocodile glossy strap.