CPSNine

Wow, very interesting watch. it is nice to see something a little bit different. The time zone feature is nice.

I like the 300SLR version, the closed case back hides the movement (for those who care about the accuracy of the movement on open case backs). However it is hard to tell if the color of the dial is right on the rep (it does not look brown), and the engraving on the case back is very lame compared to the gen.

Love your watches, love your shots... Very creative, a great pleasure to watch. When I grow up I want to be just like you

Thank you for the update.

Very cool indeed. Thanks for sharing Jkay

Thank you for sharing your experience Pakz. I also want to buy this watch and I must say that I am going through the same questions as you. especially for the movement I could not decide between the Asian clone and the DG4813. So it is nice to read you good experience with the DG4813 it makes a very nice watch at a very attractive price. I have read though that the DG4813 is not direct-drive thus inferring some stutter to the seconds hand, is it a problem on yours? Anyway I think it is a great buy that is exactly the one I want to get. Congratulation on your new watch.

I love stories with happy endings... very glad you finally got your 005 back. By the way how does your 219 compare to it?

Super cool video, loved it.

It's a different forum, you need to register an account there to see the pics.

@ Noel Fleischer How do you like the watch. Is there some kind of AR treatment on the crystal or not?

Not really sure if I can link to another forum but there are great pictures there. http://www.replica-watches-guide.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=9102

To me the new version seems as accurate as the previous one. I've tried to compare it to pictures of the Gen and it seemed pretty close. However it would be good to have the view of an expert as I am not one myself. But I would guess the factories started with the old version to make the new one and changed a couple of things on the dial so I guess accuracy should be pretty close on both models. The changes I have seen are: - The red seamaster. - The OMEGA with the linked letters. - The bars (lume) at 12-3-6-9 that are gone. I think it makes a less crowded dial and I like the touch of red with the seamaster. I personally like better the new version, I am just curious why it is that much less expensive than the previous version (not everywhere though). Just because it is less popular?

The original SMP chroho replica is featured in By-tor's Guide To Best Omega Replicas, with pretty good reviews. And the newer version seems just as good, the bezel alignment has been corrected the OMEGA inscription with the linked letters seems right and the rest of the watch seems to par with the previous version (however I am far from being an expert). The OP chronos are very cool but at 45.5mm they are quite big for my small wrist. The best price I have seen for the SMP chrono to date is at asian7750.

Hello, I am looking to buy a replica Seamaster Pro Chrono 2008 (new version with the red Seamaster etc.) with the blue face. I've been browsing the different recommended collectors and I see up to $50 difference in price for the same model. I've tried to dissect the descriptions and pictures and I really can't see anything that would justify the price difference. Is there anything I am missing that I should know before buying. Thanks.

Thank you for your answer Andreww, Do I understand correctly that none of your watch has ever been serviced and they are still running after 6 years. If that is the case it is pretty reassuring. I guess I need to build up my faith in the A7750. Did you have your watches services prior to the first use as it is recommended or not?

Hello everybody, I've been looking at the replica watche market for a couple of mounth now and I must say I was going nowhere before I finally found this awesome forum with an incredible amount of good informations shared by knowledgeable and passionate people (fine people indeed). Before that my only source of information came from replicawatchreport.com and I must say I am not too sure about the impartiality of the reviews on the site but that is another matter. So I've been gathering a maximum of informations from the forums during the last couple of days and I have kind of a generic question but I could not seem to find the answer in my researches. I have always been attracted to chrono watches and for my first rep I am probably looking to buy a Tag Rep, but I guess my question could apply to any chrono replica. From what I understand you basically have two choices for chrono movements either the A7750 or the quartz japanese OS20. The dilemma I am having, and I guess I would like to have the opinion of you experimented people, is that if I understand that the A7750 is a better mechanical reproduction of the original movements in the watches, is it really worth the "trouble" and the price (considering quartz are half the price of mechanical watches). With the servicing prior to the first use, the dont wind manually, dont change date between 7 and 3, dont reset the chrono when it is running or you'll break it and so on. Price aside, I would really prefer to buy a machanical watch, because I really think that it is what makes them wonderfull, however I am not a watchsmith and I don't have the budget to send my watch to repare every couple of mounth. If I am going to spend $300+ on a watch I sure would like it to work properly for a couple of years at least. Maybe I am seeing it worth than it is and I also dont have that much infos on the Japanese OS20 aside from the date change at 12 that can damage it so what would you recommend me to do. Also is there any quality difference between the quartz and mechanical replicas (aside from the movement) in the build quality? Thank you very much for your help. Nick.