Having read a number of forums on the difference between a genuine watch and a replica I started to wonder if we (the replica enthusiast) are starting to "lose the plot". I was reading a debate on Anti-reflective crytals on Omega watches and the alignment of the bezel not being as good as the genuine article. Let's just stop for a minute and think about what we're asking for - I have just bought a 5th gen. Omega PO and I paid the equivalent of 5% of the price of the genuine article. To me, it is as good as owning the original and a blind man would be pleased to spot the difference between it and a genuine PO ! A replica by it's definition is not a "perfect clone" (despite the name of a certain replica company !!), if it was perfect, it would no longer be a "replica". Let's not get too hung up about "minor" differences and imperfections, after all, for the money, these watches are all masterpieces and I applaude the superb workmanship and engineering of the peolple who strive to create the perfect "replica" for us hard to please enthusiasts.