Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

By-Tor

Diamond Member
  • Posts

    10,472
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by By-Tor

  1. Joshua's has the cyclops placed WAY too right on the crystal, short gmt hand and apparently the stock-ETA date font which is inaccurate. This watch is definitely not worth it.

    I don't know what model Elprimerozen posted in his comparison but it had correctly placed cyclops/datewheel with correct font.

  2. The lume is easy to get good, but the rest of the picture becomes grainy and ugly because of too little light. I got the idea for this from a watch photography site months ago... but can't find the link anymore. Damn... I try to find it so you can try it yourself.

    Anyway, it's not rocket science, just a simple Photoshop trick. This is how everyone do it... if you want good daylight lume shot, that is.

  3. Horologically 2893 is superior movement to 2836-2 without a doubt... and a real GMT movement. That's not even under the discussion. I just pointed out the differencies between these two 2836-2 "faux GMT" setups. The other one is reliable, the other one might not be. :)

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up