Cucumber_Jones

Well I had a 2005 OCR one and it just was not doing it for me. I looked at many options and I did not really want a major bike manufacturer anymore. I thought about the Cervello as I am Canadian and I love the look of the bikes. However, I am very fortunate to work right near Campione Cycles - Giuseppe Cramerotti

Slayer took his usual dump all over the thead and it was sad to see. In fact it was more then sad it was pathetic. Yes this is a great idea and I hope Ken can make it happen. I just bought a set of 2007 Callaway widesole Fusions. I could always use a rescue club.

I saw that one the other day. You have truly outdone yourself with that photo my friend.

This is a shame V. This is why us angelus guys only share angelus info with a select few. I have had a load of asshat PM's asking for info.

Enjoy the 4 days Mark! Take care.

So this idiot is still scamming people into thinking that this is the correct movt. I guess it is a smart way to drive up the price of the wrong movement. (note this movement is TOO big for a watch.).

Yup this is the best one to have!

Here is what you do: 1. Move to texas 2. Ship the watch back.

I am going to go play with my panerai. See ya!

Looks like everyone feels a need for me to insult someone here...? I have no interest in insulting anyone, not neil, klink, puggy, andrew or anyone else. For me this is about relica watches - for that matter relica panerai. I have said that I do not support anyone being insuted - thus you should be able to clearly understand my opinion on this whole situation. You should be able to infer how I feel with out me having to do what started this all myself.

See above for my take. Also take note that I was on your side with your replicast. The no balls comment is over the line andrew.

Ok boys, I have a life - as do the other mods. The reps forums are not our lives. I do not read every thread. I had NO interest in reading the origional thread that caused this cluster f*ck. Sorry that I do not read all the threads, I never will as I have a family and a very good job. To clear things up RWI is TIM's board full stop. He can and will do what he wants. I may not agree with it all but that is the way it is. The 5 star thing is his baby and I have NO say in it. Also to clear things up I defend all the replica forums (except old RWG) - not just RWI. I think that everyone who contributes (or even lurks) should be welcome unless they insult people or scam people. Everyone who has been around for a while knows that Klink can get a little hot under the colar. TIM (DRMM) made him admin from day one. My job is to try to get along with all the admin and all the members - I think that I have done that. I do not want anyone to feel unwelcome and I believe that Klink is disapointed with his own actions and I hope and expect that things will change. We all get upset at times and we all say things we regret at times. Last time I checked I don't have any control over others actions. Neil - to be honest I have very little to do with the dealer component of RWI. There are some dealers I aprove of and some that I do not. I would like to let everyone know that I am the one who took the initative to remove luckyyy from RWI. Many did not like this decison, I did it in the interest of the members. That is about the extent of my dealings with the dealer portion of the board. For what it is worth I am happy to change my status to regular member anyday that there are members of any of the replica forums who feel that the time I spend trying to help provide a place for all our members to share their interests is of no value. I am sure my family would be happy to have me spend less time on the boards.

I am sorry you feel this way Grinder. Perhaps once you have been in this community a little longer you will gain a larger perspective. This issue with your VIP was a small oversite and a little mistake. If you are this fickel I suspect you will find issues with all the forums at some point. Not everyone gets allong in these forums. From what I know of your story Klink was trying to help you out. BTW Grinder, DRM is not a mod his is the OWNER of the forum.

FWIW - The 5 Star dealer idea was Tim's and RWI is HIS board. Please do not bring the admin into this one. Also, Neil, please understand that this is a battle (or debate) between Pug and Klink - Do not bring me or the other admin into it. Non of us are involved with this developing story.

I look forward to seeing your project complete. I was lucky as I wanted a base model so it made a very tough job a little bit easier.

I think all the forums provide our members with a place to spend time discussing what we have in common. I think there are subtle diferences and the vein of similarity is that we all love watches. Also the Admin at each site work hard to provide us our members with a fun and comfortable place to spend time.

FYI Eddie is in YVR but the watches do not come from here. I have ordered from many of our dealers about 14 times and no problems yet (to Vancouver)

IMHO this is no diferent then any other panerai reps. I have many panerai reps and I forget about the flaws. I really do not worry about it. I think on your first panerai your worry a bunch but as they pile up you worry less.

I will buy nothing but MP's from now on. I have a few so far and they are awesome.

Kruzer - Looks great, I need to get my bezel polished. Did they remove the markers before the polish job? If Mark can manage to remove the indexes and do a convincing T marker that would be crazy. I love all my subs and I honestly forget about the flaws with my watches when I wear them.

You do know that the 540 does not work right? Feel free to spend your money on one - it makes a nice rolex pocket watch.

This is a gen 24a. This is the (my) rep 24a I think it is the 24b that has the hash marks and the silver rings.

This is the 24a that you are talking about and showing photos of and the 12 clicks are correct. However, the bezzel SHOULD be polished and the silver rings shoud NOT be on the 24a. There is a 24 with rings on the markers but it is not the A series. The rings on the markers is correct only on the version with the bezzel with the hash marks from top to 15min. The 24a should be polished bezzel with no hash marks and the indexes should have no rings. I hope this makes sense. The 24a version is very nice but it is not correct. I have one and I have a 243 (187 as well) the 24a and the 243 are a great pair. I would actualy say that the 243 is a little more correct the the 24a.

I would not worry about the hands as that movt will not fit in a panerai case - with out a butt load of case work.

Sorry this is a stupid post. Why would you post a bunch of gens that you do not own with no story.