Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

jackflash

VIP Member
  • Posts

    2,138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    142

Posts posted by jackflash

  1. Congrats! That's a pretty good case. Looks like someone's been a little enthusiastic with the chamfers, but nothing too much to worry about. 

     

    Case back markings look to be good quality, the serial number is unusual though. It should start with 0552 (Royal Navy) or W10 (British Army) rather than 6645. I was intrigued and just googled it. This 5517 has your serial number! As you'll see in the shot of the case back, the serial starts with W10/6645...:

    http://www.thetimetraveler.co/watches/sold/198/5517/5517-full-spec-all-original-milsub-w10/

     

    As you're in the US, Phong is probably your best bet in terms of service and shipping – he's based in Arizona. 

     

    There are a couple of semi-reliable high-end suppliers from Vietnam. Minh Quy (MQ) is one you may hear about. He's tricky to deal with. I personally won't be dealing with him again after receiving a shoddy case and poor service. Others have had a better experience with him though and his dials do look good:

    http://vintagewatchesmq.com/minhquy/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage.tpl&product_id=800&category_id=146&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=1

     

    Ruby is another, however she's not always responsive to messages via the website:

    http://rubyswatch.com/Products/h1-1-|-vintage-|-submariner-|-military-|-5517-|-dial-2106

     

    Looking forward to seeing your build come together!

     

    • Like 1
  2. Welcome to your journey down the rabbit hole! Really need to see more shots of your case, but front-on it looks good. That insert looks very good. Generally they are one of the weak points of 5517 build so you're off to a good start.

     

    Next the dial, you could try Phong:

    http://www.jewelryandwatch.com/contents/en-us/d216_5517_Subamriner_dials.html

     

    He has Sword hands too for a gen movement. Although the tail of the second hand is too long and will need trimming:

    http://www.jewelryandwatch.com/contents/en-us/d222_Submariner_1680,_5512,_5517,_6538.html

     

    Good luck! Lots of info on the forum to help you on your journey!

     

    Here’s my not so high-end build with an ETA 2846 movement.

    ea302180fea098cabd8db7d2f42f940c.jpg&key=a2bff670bf53243e7cdbae62cb2961ebf3769ffd200cfa1447c076c8a767cfa4

    dd821e28c103a6683baafabbc482f33d.jpg&key=6dd3a3f58e2d51634cfad406145463c83b9851dadcdb5e26e10fb331b0c22059

     

    • Like 1
  3. 3 hours ago, mzinski said:
    So I got my MQ case today - same chamfer in the rehaute that you mentioned and encountered with your case.

    1. How did you fix the rehaute to angle straight down? 

    I reduced the height of the rehaut slightly and re-finished the inner wall (sanded) to reduce reflections. You can't take too much off the inner as it will also expand the dial seat, if you do the dial will fall through.

    The the addition of a GS PA 462-66 crystal from Ofrei helped too. Some crystals, i.e. the T19 from Clark, have the effect of distorting the rehaut width. I would avoid them. The high-dome T19 crystal (CWPT19) from Michael Young would be another option, it actually reduces the width of the rehaut optically. However, they do tend to fracture easily around the base when fitted and they aren't cheap. Take a look at the fourth post in the link below:

    Quote
    2. Are we certain it should have the chamfer? 

    No it shouldn't, the rehaut should be 90° to the dial face. But with the a little effort it’s not so noticeable.

    88b199774c976a5f5605856bd4ea4062.jpg&key=a57f33b06c1d5f0dafd67a056fefc3c5990045fa7f5cde7531b6a7c7c372e814

     

    • Thanks 1
  4. I just noticed that people often post Tudor stuff here and not in the Rolex section.. doh!

    I think the Tudor brand deserves it’s own section on the forum. It has grown massively in popularity again since the launch of the Black Bay etc. Both Rolex and Tudor belong to the Hans Wilsdorf foundation. However, it’s equally “incorrect” to post Tudor watches in the Rolex brand section from a brand-positioning perspective.
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up