Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

AllergyDoc

Member
  • Posts

    1,174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AllergyDoc

  1. Yup. I'm very fortunate to own a gen. vintage Cosmo., am very well aquainted with the watch, since I was able to tell time wanted one, and too with the flaw and drawbacks of the replicas having focused on them obsessively for years and years on RWG (do any of the old timers remember 'Halley' on the old RWG? :) The man knew his 6263's well and afore a lot of the heavy weights here ever Googled 'replica') . Yet and still, the real screaming flaw, even the symmetrical pusher models, is the pristine out-of-the-box state of the 'replica'. Those would indeed be Toady's 50K specimen. Mods there can be well achieved in great depth or casual external patina only. It can go by degrees. No one should deny the replica for minutia. Afterall, the WIS's obsessions have their place, but 'in the style of........' hommage should not be denied.

    I would cast a vote going the 'Spinmaster' DW route. If money is an object, then demure the Valjoux and opt for the 7750. They are such a 'score' with respect to the hobby; 'replica', and despite my good fortune, still want one. If merely for 'paste'.

    6263II.jpg

    What a fabulous watch to have! I don't recall you posting about this Daytona before. Why would you want the modern one if you have this one?

  2. I second Noel's sentiments. BK has fixed several problems for me, once on one of his watches I bought from another member. :good:

    (Found this thread while looking for the WM9 thread I started. Search function wouldn't reveal it, so I have to search manually. :angry: )

  3. Not something I could wear myself, but a fine piece :good: Good to see you posting, Doc :drinks:

    :D Thanks, TJ.

    I used to wear gold all the time. Now I have this one, which I wear 1-2 times a month, my TT YM, which I wear weekly, and a RG 183, which I'm hit-and-miss with. The gold reps tarnish quickly here and require regular upkeep--I'm too lazy for that! :p

  4. Me being a usual John Do actually like this one:

    rols020.jpg

    I know it's the wrong size (40mm), symmetrical pusher, I THINK the subdial spacing is too wide because of the Seagull movement, the ROC is bit too heavy, some probably find the "tritium" dots too yellow (I don't mind that), and the crown is too large...but hey...how many people do you know of have come across a $50,000 vintage 6263?

    I like the movement (solid and reliable). The Spinmaster one is nice...but 3x the price.

    I bought this one from Silix a year or so ago. I asked for a Seagull model but got a 7750. The hour subdial should be tracking the hour hand. (Silix has never sold the one with the fixed hour subdial, to my knowledge.) It was a very nice watch and very accurate time-keeper, but too light for my tastes.

    SilixTona011.jpg

  5. I bought my wife a D40 a couple of years ago. I like the images that come out of that camera better than those my D80 produces, at half the cost!

    I use a Tamron 90 macro lens with my D80. I bought it 2nd hand from Adorma and it's a great lens.

    If you're never going to use the macro lens as a portrait lens (which you really should do), then get the manual focus. That little 60mm AF-S full auto focus will double as a great little 90mm (equivalent) portrait lens! I use my 50mm 1.8 almost as much as I use my 18-200mm VR.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up