hiker01 Posted June 27, 2009 Report Share Posted June 27, 2009 I don't know if this is good enough? What do you think, Vintage Rolex experts? and some wristies: Probably needs some more work on the dial......... Thanks for looking! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vlydog Posted June 27, 2009 Report Share Posted June 27, 2009 I'm no expert but I like what I see. Looks great on the Zulu. Very nice photographs also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted June 27, 2009 Report Share Posted June 27, 2009 I like the pics. Excellent composition. But I do not like the caseback at all. Also, the 6 & 9 index markers are a bit too narrow, but I would need to see better pics of the watch itself (good, clear close-ups) to see enough detail to comment further (reliably). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trailboss Posted June 27, 2009 Report Share Posted June 27, 2009 Tho, that's allready closer than most peeps will se it. The Real World, curtesy Fakemaster: Not to shaby at all. I'd be happy to own it. Col. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted June 27, 2009 Report Share Posted June 27, 2009 The first thing that sticks out are the bulky crown guards, which used to be a notorious flaw on all Rolex reps. They are WAY too thick on your rep. There's some little variation but they're always pretty tiny little "chops" on the vintage Subs and Dwellers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanuq Posted June 27, 2009 Report Share Posted June 27, 2009 I like how RED the text is on your dial. The bezel looks to be from a Sub, where the SD bezel is much thicker. Once you fit the thicker bezel, you'll have to fit a taller domed crystal, so take that as you like. You have the older fonts on your insert, which is very cool... most inserts have a "flat four" and yours is pointy. No drooping crown guards, very nice. I agree with Freddy, the caseback is pretty unfulfilling. Overall? It's darn nice. WAY better than the vast majority of what was out there even 5 or 7 years ago! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted June 27, 2009 Report Share Posted June 27, 2009 Looking good, bro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now