Enough with the excessive watermarks

[Ronin]

Seriously? This is ridiculous guys. I would love to see the face of the watch...

Please one is enough, ok, maybe two, but lets not obscure things like the date window. Pretty Please....

[maxman]

+1 We need to see the watch as clearly as possable, this dosent help matters. Mike

[By-Tor]

They're afraid that someone counterfeits their pictures, so they have to be copyrighted and watermarked.

Ahh the irony.

[onzenuub]

Just look for pictures being posted by buyers, no watermarks on them.

[maxman]

They're afraid that someone counterfeits their pictures, so they have to be copyrighted and watermarked.

Ahh the irony.

WOW,Now thats what I call Irony

[fakemaster]

+10000. Especially aince the pictures aren't even theirs to begin with.

[Agrippa]

Couldn't agree more. Quite frankly, at some sites the use of watermarks is just f**king ridiculous. Don't they have the wits to realise that if their pictures are so crap you have to go elsewhere to actually see the watch, chances are you'll spend your money elsehwere too?

[redwatch]

Silly.....just plain silly. There are more effective ways to digitally water mark a picture but still allow a possible buyer to see the important details (like the date window)

[max33]

+1.

I don't browse Josh website anymore. His pictures are as annoying as wearing glasses with stains all over.

I moved on to puretimewatch. They have decent visibility pictures.

[Ronin]

Perhaps friends of Josh/Andrew or the admin team could give them a little nudge next time they have contact with them. It is clearly driving business away.