Ronin Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Seriously? This is ridiculous guys. I would love to see the face of the watch... Please one is enough, ok, maybe two, but lets not obscure things like the date window. Pretty Please.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxman Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 +1 We need to see the watch as clearly as possable, this dosent help matters. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 They're afraid that someone counterfeits their pictures, so they have to be copyrighted and watermarked. Ahh the irony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onzenuub Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Just look for pictures being posted by buyers, no watermarks on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxman Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 They're afraid that someone counterfeits their pictures, so they have to be copyrighted and watermarked. Ahh the irony. WOW,Now thats what I call Irony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakemaster Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 +10000. Especially aince the pictures aren't even theirs to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agrippa Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Couldn't agree more. Quite frankly, at some sites the use of watermarks is just f**king ridiculous. Don't they have the wits to realise that if their pictures are so crap you have to go elsewhere to actually see the watch, chances are you'll spend your money elsehwere too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwatch Posted March 11, 2010 Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 Silly.....just plain silly. There are more effective ways to digitally water mark a picture but still allow a possible buyer to see the important details (like the date window) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max33 Posted March 12, 2010 Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 +1. I don't browse Josh website anymore. His pictures are as annoying as wearing glasses with stains all over. I moved on to puretimewatch. They have decent visibility pictures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronin Posted March 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 Perhaps friends of Josh/Andrew or the admin team could give them a little nudge next time they have contact with them. It is clearly driving business away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now