slay Posted September 29, 2006 Report Posted September 29, 2006 I think its real ugly and looks like some sort of walmart watch. I'd neither wear (if it was free) nor buy it. - just MHO!
TwoTone Posted September 29, 2006 Report Posted September 29, 2006 I think it is a stunning Watch... Simple yet elegant... I came close to purchasing a Gen a few months back in Portland... But I hesitated to long and it was gone
Highflyingclive Posted September 29, 2006 Report Posted September 29, 2006 I want a Radiomir GMT! Either of these will do.
new & improved osteopath Posted September 29, 2006 Report Posted September 29, 2006 I am sorry, but to me, the Mare Nostrum has always looked like a Swatch Irony Chrono. Just an opinion, -O
rolli Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 hi all, let us begin a new poll about the pam6, pam7, pam8 and or 5218-301A . i think we need new pam models and i think this one. v and i would buy the mare nostrum. how many here would buy this baby too. cheers rolli
panera Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 Absulately I may buy........Just Peeerfect
t Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 I think its real ugly and looks like some sort of walmart watch. I'd neither wear (if it was free) nor buy it. - just MHO! @Slay your words are sometimes hard... but you ask it. That´s why i like your comments BTW, TTK like your comments, too Mare Nostrum is a very ugly watch. And not one of best quality models from Panerai. But it is over and over again the same story... write Rolex or Panerai on a walmart watch and all people will love it. best exsample: submariner LV... a divers watch with green bezel :yucky: .... OH SORRY - it is rolex and it is limited
rolli Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 @Slay your words are sometimes hard... but you ask it. That´s why i like your comments BTW, TTK like your comments, too Mare Nostrum is a very ugly watch. And not one of best quality models from Panerai. But it is over and over again the same story... write Rolex or Panerai on a walmart watch and all people will love it. best exsample: submariner LV... a divers watch with green bezel :yucky: .... OH SORRY - it is rolex and it is limited hi tourby, could you not find better and lovely words for the beauties. cheers rolli
mikebrooke Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 NO NO NO WHAT WE REALLY WANT IS A GPF 2/56 ! The GRANDADDY of them all. Alli construction (not too hard surely?) and a mouthwatering OVERALL 60mm! mmm mmm mmm mmm
archibald Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 Like I said when tis thread was shiny and new, if they would just do a seonds @ 3 hrono movement, even if it's a handwind movement w/o a module, they could do not only the Mare Nostrum, my holy grail brietling, the Tag Monaco, and a dozen other reps that would sell like hotcakes. If you look at the most reent seagull threads, they clearly have tooled up enough to do it--if they can copy the Jaquet big date module and make double tourbillons, even a DD module copy is within reach. BTW, here's a pic of a display ST-19 w/ a swans nck regulator:
hambone Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 The Mare Nostrum is my favorite pam that has a white dial and I would get one if it were a rep. It is a very elegant looking watch
trinsic Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 We need this panerai. And I mean we really need it. As in really really need it. Don't know if I've said it before but guys we really need this panerai.
Pugwash Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 Like I said when tis thread was shiny and new, if they would just do a seonds @ 3 hrono movement, even if it's a handwind movement w/o a module, they could do not only the Mare Nostrum, my holy grail brietling, the Tag Monaco, and a dozen other reps that would sell like hotcakes. Yeah, but they'd have to make it as slim as the 2894 if you want the watches not to be unrealistically thick, and as soon as you're trying to rep the 2894, you're in trouble; It's not uncomplicated. You're better off getting a Valgranges rep and ... oh, never mind.
rolli Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 come on guys more positive statements, this models they want to be taken in possession. rolli
Pugwash Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 come on guys more positive statements, this models they want to be taken in possession. Find a movement and then you're in with a chance. No viable movement, then the watch has to be as widely desirable as a Daytona.
AMK000 Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 I want a Radiomir GMT! Either of these will do. I am in for these Radiomirs too. .... so many great Pams with date not yet been reproduced.
t Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 Yeah, but they'd have to make it as slim as the 2894 if you want the watches not to be unrealistically thick, and as soon as you're trying to rep the 2894, you're in trouble; It's not uncomplicated. You're better off getting a Valgranges rep and ... oh, never mind. Pugi where you will find Valgranges??? ETA told me 12-16 month waiting period???
Tim Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 We need this panerai. And I mean we really need it. As in really really need it. Don't know if I've said it before but guys we really need this panerai. ....need it like another hole in the head. Have you guys looked to see how many Pannie reps are out there already? Personnally I'd prefer some of the other model lines be beefed up. And if they are going to spend time on a movement, it ought to be a decent automatic with seconds at six. /Tim
Pugwash Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 where you will find Valgranges??? ETA told me 12-16 month waiting period??? Precisely.
archibald Posted February 28, 2007 Report Posted February 28, 2007 You're better off getting a Valgranges rep and ... oh, never mind. Not a bad idea, actually...
archibald Posted March 1, 2007 Report Posted March 1, 2007 Precisely. More like 12 months and you have to buy it in a watch...
Pugwash Posted March 1, 2007 Report Posted March 1, 2007 please vote on watch polls. rolli No, please don't. They're not supposed to be polls any more.
Pugwash Posted March 1, 2007 Report Posted March 1, 2007 More like 12 months and you have to buy it in a watch... The point I was making was that no matter what, we're not getting Valgranges or 2894s in reps. Not in 2007, probably not in 2008, either.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now