How are those Asian clone Rolex movts?

[Prsist]

Are they reliable like other Asian clone movts?

I thought I read the came with extra parts floating around that can become dislodged and cause havoc for the movts. Myth or fact?

[jmb]

Crap. They are basically a "decorated" clone 2836. The screw attaching the faux balance bridge was loose on the only one I've had. I removed the decorative bits and after that I had a nice accurate clone 2836 that made the watch cost more than if it had shipped with an ETA... Reports also that the rotor cover falling off (attached with tape) and/or rotor falling off...

[slickdick]

Fact its crap. The search engine isn't your friend

[FxrAndy]

I have to agree it is not great and the bits fall off

[rosnik]

IMO: to call "Rolex CLONE" that movement, is optimistic....

[Prsist]

Fact its crap. The search engine isn't your friend

Please see my prior post "Search Function Officially Sucks" :bleh:

[chefcook]

I currently have one on my desk and I have to admit that I could not imagine those movements to be as badly made as they are. Crap in a new dimension.

[mossanti]

Is this apply to the GMT II also? I heard from someone that the movement is better for Gmt II ?