Which Is Gen Or Rep ......or Are They Both Gen/rep?

[Gadget Man]

The second pic in "watch A" is actually the gen correct ? Just put in the wrong place ?

You got me wondering so I have just checked all my photo's and you are right and I am wrong, it was the gen in the second pic of watch 'A; so sorry about that and well spotted.

[relaxman]

Phew, thought my ole eyes were failing me. Great looking rep and gen none the less.

[freddy333]

No wonder I got the pics confused (it was not me)........

[Valty]

The BK's one is really impressive - if we except the crappy crown

I'm really surprised to see there is not so much differences...

Both are in any case very great

[preacher62]

I say B is gen and that is purely for the coronet on the dial. It has a nice, flat oval that dims to the rest of the coronet. The coronet on the A dial has an oval that is too round and does not dim. (Not sure "dim" is the right word.)

[blue_sphere]

A looks like a rep to me.

B looks gen.

I'll admit- This is a tricky one, but I'm looking at and comparing the crown position and hands.

This going soley on those pearls. Instantly gives away the rep

[glennmichael]

A - WM9 V3 ( Tells - 1.Thick silver marker ring, 2. shorter bezel teeth 3. Tell from SEL fitting in some pic )

B - Gen

Just my observation

Edited September 23, 2011 by glennmichael

[jcagara08]

hardly coudn't tell man

[dublinlad]

The numbers on the bezel insert are almost touching the bezel in watch A... A gen insert would be a vast improvement on whats already very very good

[Dizzy]

When you compare the side shots of the crown position, you can see how inaccurate the WM9 really is. The case is a completely different shape and the bezel is totally different, the end links suck. I never understood the hype about the WM9's. They are close, but everything about it is just a little bit off.

dizz