Gadget Man Posted September 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 The second pic in "watch A" is actually the gen correct ? Just put in the wrong place ? You got me wondering so I have just checked all my photo's and you are right and I am wrong, it was the gen in the second pic of watch 'A; so sorry about that and well spotted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
relaxman Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Phew, thought my ole eyes were failing me. Great looking rep and gen none the less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 No wonder I got the pics confused (it was not me)........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valty Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 The BK's one is really impressive - if we except the crappy crown I'm really surprised to see there is not so much differences... Both are in any case very great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preacher62 Posted September 22, 2011 Report Share Posted September 22, 2011 I say B is gen and that is purely for the coronet on the dial. It has a nice, flat oval that dims to the rest of the coronet. The coronet on the A dial has an oval that is too round and does not dim. (Not sure "dim" is the right word.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue_sphere Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 A looks like a rep to me. B looks gen. I'll admit- This is a tricky one, but I'm looking at and comparing the crown position and hands. This going soley on those pearls. Instantly gives away the rep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glennmichael Posted September 23, 2011 Report Share Posted September 23, 2011 (edited) A - WM9 V3 ( Tells - 1.Thick silver marker ring, 2. shorter bezel teeth 3. Tell from SEL fitting in some pic ) B - Gen Just my observation Edited September 23, 2011 by glennmichael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcagara08 Posted September 24, 2011 Report Share Posted September 24, 2011 hardly coudn't tell man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dublinlad Posted September 24, 2011 Report Share Posted September 24, 2011 The numbers on the bezel insert are almost touching the bezel in watch A... A gen insert would be a vast improvement on whats already very very good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted September 25, 2011 Report Share Posted September 25, 2011 When you compare the side shots of the crown position, you can see how inaccurate the WM9 really is. The case is a completely different shape and the bezel is totally different, the end links suck. I never understood the hype about the WM9's. They are close, but everything about it is just a little bit off. dizz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now