Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently picked up a new Navitimer tricompax (thanks GK) as a base for modding. I've been told by a rep dealer that there were 3 'factories' producing Navitimers, and I believe that

this is the latest and possibly only version available.

It has a different case from my v1's. Taller strap lugs (incorrect compared to gen), sliderule better than v2, dial better than v1 & possibly v2. It has high beat a7750 decorated and also has the signed rotor. The sapphire crystal has the most AR I've seen on any standard Navi rep. However, it has a terrible hue to it, making the subdials and sliderule look beige. So bad that I felt it was unwearable as is.

I had seen this bad AR on another rep sometime ago. Today I decided to open up this new watch and take a look.

L to R: v1- no/very light AR; v3- single AR; v1 with Taka AR

Look how beige the v3 looks. It is worse in natural light.

S5001348.jpg

Here we see the difference against a white background. The v3 has a beige crystal!!

S5001351.jpg

S5001353.jpg

I swapped the v1 crystal for the v3, so that it is wearable in the meantime while I send the other to Uwe for double AR treatment. 8)

I was also bothered by the infamous sunken date. I remembered that I had a spare ETA 7750 dw @6 lying around. I decided to have a go at the raised DW mod as perfected by

the modders on these forums.

First, i snapped off the teeth using fine pliers. Then smoothed off the inside with a round file. The DW thickness is 0.5mm.

Then I used - wait for it... fishing line to raise the DW! :lol:

It just happens to be 0.3mm thick - which was perfect to make the assembly 0.8mm overall.

I glued the line to the underside edge of the DW. This took a while using a sharpened toothpick, being very careful not to let excess superglue run or stick to my fingers.

I then marked out the plate to indicate the original DW numerals to align the new DW later

S5001354.jpg

This was carefully glued to the outer edge of original DW. The mechanism was tested and dial added. I put tiny pieces of sellotape under the dial near the feet to slightly clear the dial from new DW. Refit dial and test. The DW mod took me about 1.5 hours to do.

S5001355-1.jpg

S5001356-1.jpg

S5001357-1.jpg

Here is the non-AR crystal and raised DW! Admittedly, the date changeover isn't as smooth as i'd like; due to excess glue touching the transfer gears, but it does work nevertheless.

I'll fix it for good when I get the treated crystal. I'm much happier with the colour of dial and sliderule now.

S5001358-1.jpg

...and a few quick & dirty shots of this work in progress :)

S5001360-1.jpg

S5001361-1.jpg

S5001370-1.jpg

S5001373.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Very nice little write up. Definitely fix up the "excess glue" issue. You don't want piece of hardened glue coming off and ending up in the movement somewhere. That would be bad

Posted

Great job!!!

Nice detailed pics and write up too

Think we will see new navi high quality reps this year? I hope so would love to have one but don't want to invest in what mods it would take a current rep to look good enough for me

Posted

Importr, I was looking at this picture and wondering how you accomplished it? Aren't there supposed to be transfer gears that pass over the datewheel on the tricompax A7750?

S5001354.jpg

Posted

Yes, the gears are above the old DW (still in place) but underneath the new DW as shown fitted above.

The glued 0.3mm fishing line forms a solid ring (under the new DW) which just clears the gears.

If you look very closely by numbers 6 and 7, you can just see the old DW :)

Posted

Yes, the gears are above the old DW (still in place) but underneath the new DW as shown fitted above.

The glued 0.3mm fishing line forms a solid ring (under the new DW) which just clears the gears.

If you look very closely by numbers 6 and 7, you can just see the old DW :)

Ah, I get it. Did you use a sigle piece of line and wrap it completely around or did you just use several small pieces spread equally around?

Posted

Just one continuous length. It's easier to manage this way and probably more secure.

I would prefer to use a metallic ring, but don't have the time or resource to make one.

Hence this cheap alternative. I think it is 10lb fishing line

Posted

Great work Importr. Result looks great. Not sure I would have used fishing line myself (given the finicky nature of working with it) but it looks like it worked. Andreww may be on to a good idea about using just a few stand offs around the perimeter of the DW.

Posted

The multiple piece approach could be fiddly to apply, as they will be tiny.

Slightly out of line and it will jam on the gears. Plus if one fell off, its gonna be stuck somewhere?

Posted

Also good points. We need to find some kind of common household or hardware item that can be used to make the spacer. Gonna think about it for a bit.

Posted

I was just gonna use an old 7750 DW, and thin it out. But I need a jewellers lathe, which I obviously don't have.

I have about 20 old 7750 DWs! If I could machine them down, they would be a perfect mod for all the existing tricompax reps out there! :D

Posted

Also good points. We need to find some kind of common household or hardware item that can be used to make the spacer. Gonna think about it for a bit.

i was thinking a caseback O-ring? probably too thick though.

Posted

That could work, if you found the exact size.

Not sure if the glue solvent would accelerate the rubber perishing?

Posted

What about even using some good old wire. Like a strand of picture wire or copper conductor. Something malleable that can be formed to the correct shape and will stay that way during adhesion. Trick is to find the right size I guess.

Posted

Yes I also tried fuse wire. But what I had was either too thick or too thin. I guess I got lucky.... :)

Posted

Is it possible to solder the ends together , then rub it smooth - when setting the shape? Or is it too thin to solder?

Posted

Possible but tricky I think. Plus, once you smooth it out I am not sure how much would remain to hold it together. Besides, if it as a formable material it should keep it's shape during the adhesion process. Then, once glued in, it would be held in place.

Posted (edited)

Very interesting thread. I have a navi I'm happy to experiment with! Where can I find a nice date wheel to fit a navi fighter model? ETA or rep as longmasmit looks decent!<br />I like a idea of using house hold materials to space the layered date wheel. Very clever

7a64b7d4-45f1-c521.jpg

Edited by dmacnz
Posted

just saw this...awesome!...

is the fishing line glued right to the edge of the dw?...how much space is there between the edge of the gear and the edge of the dw?...

thinking krpster is on to something with wrapping 30 guage wire around an object the size of a dw...hmmm...

@importr --> can you take a pix of the 6 o'clock dw and where it aligns in the date window when it flips over on its own?...i can't recall how off it is compared to using a 4.5 o'clock dw...i do like the 6 o'clock dw's alignment in the 4.5 date window...especially days 1-9!

R-

Posted

Very interesting thread. I have a navi I'm happy to experiment with! Where can I find a nice date wheel to fit a navi fighter model? ETA or rep as longmasmit looks decent!<br />I like a idea of using house hold materials to space the layered date wheel. Very clever

7a64b7d4-45f1-c521.jpg

On a Fighters, you have to use a different approach. There are no transfer gears in your watch, the sunken DW is due to an extra plate. You have to remove and modify the plate. Once you do so, you can just glue another datewheel on top of the one that's already in the watch.

Posted

@importr --> can you take a pix of the 6 o'clock dw and where it aligns in the date window when it flips over on its own?...i can't recall how off it is compared to using a 4.5 o'clock dw...i do like the 6 o'clock dw's alignment in the 4.5 date window...especially days 1-9!

R-

Sorry, i can't do that request as the DW@6 was modded to removed the teeth, then attached to original DW. Therefore the alignment with date window is perfect.

However, what I can say is that a unmodified DW@6 will almost certainly be off by >1/3 a number when viewed thru a date window @4.5.

If you're planning on fitting a DW@6 without raising it - i'd say don't do it. The sunken-ness will still bug you. It's only worth doing if you do the mod as described. :)

The gap between gear and calendar plate (if thats the correct terminolgy) is less than 1mm. I'd say closer to 0.5mm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up