Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

The "New" Asian 2836-2 GMT movement, review, defect, upgrade


RWG Technical

Recommended Posts

The issue I had - and which I think was the most common one with the GMTII - was the GMT hand slipping. The rest was fine.

This I received in May of last year. Wonder if that was the old GMT modification and if a similar one today would not have that issue?

Asking because I up to now have recommended to go 21J instead of A2836 for GMT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue I had - and which I think was the most common one with the GMTII - was the GMT hand slipping. The rest was fine.

This I received in May of last year. Wonder if that was the old GMT modification and if a similar one today would not have that issue?

Yes, The Zigmeister is saying that the newest asian GMT module will no longer slip and become useless if it's properly maintained.

He's saying it has finally been made properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R,

Excellent work. I have to agree with you on the clone 2892's. I bought a rep Omega AT from Joshua that was sold to me as "Swiss ETA 2892-2" and was actually a clone. (Of course, why am I not surprised when the watch was $268+shipping?) After having it for a few weeks it stopped running while in my watch box. It would wind manually, but obviously something was off. Well, $30-something worth of ETA parts and it's running well, but there's obviously some flaws in them somewhere.

--Jer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R,

Excellent work. I have to agree with you on the clone 2892's. I bought a rep Omega AT from Joshua that was sold to me as "Swiss ETA 2892-2" and was actually a clone. (Of course, why am I not surprised when the watch was $268+shipping?) After having it for a few weeks it stopped running while in my watch box. It would wind manually, but obviously something was off. Well, $30-something worth of ETA parts and it's running well, but there's obviously some flaws in them somewhere.

--Jer

I have had poor results with the 2892 clone's, they all had defects. I finally had to replace them with ETA 2892's, the clone's are very poor quality, surprised you got yours working with the ETA parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up