panerai153 Posted July 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2012 getting back on subject just a bit, does anyone know which 6mm crown fits the ming Quy case. i had an old 6mm from long ago, but it's too small, Inside diameter. It won't thread on the tube. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted July 20, 2012 Report Share Posted July 20, 2012 Unless you know otherwise, I would assume the tube is aftermarket & replace it with a gen (& matching 6mm crown). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zeleni kukuruz Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Now, if the dial was ever made way havent anyone seen the real thing then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanuq Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 The details that convince me come from Stefano's macro shots. It's clear the white-with-black dials were produced with the same pad that printed the black-with-gilt dials. So either Rolex made the dials or someone got Rolex's pads and made the dials using genuine materials. Either way I'm convinced the white dial exists as a genuine Rolex piece. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zeleni kukuruz Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Yes i have read all that info! But isent it strange way rolex are so quiet about it? Way havent they confirmed it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donerix 2.0 Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Do they ever ....? I would say put whatever you feel like. I like both of them: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zeleni kukuruz Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Dont get me wrong Don, i like them also very very much but it would be great to know if the white was fake or real! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Yes i have read all that info! But isent it strange way rolex are so quiet about it? Way havent they confirmed it? It has always been Rolex's policy not to confirm or deny anything relating to the design, construction or success of their products that has not been officially announced or put into print. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panerai153 Posted August 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 2, 2012 Freddy is correct. Ther have been some discussionbs over on the VRF that have gotten pretty heated, to say the least. One paragraph ,sometimes one sentence from Rolex SA would put every one of these arguments to rest, but unfortunately, Rolex will not comment. Until someone comes up with irrefutible evidence that these were real, and that the PanAm story is true, the saga of the White dial will be open to speculation. It is strange that someone, a widow, child of a a PanAm executive,or even someone who worked for panAm during that era hasn't come forward with some sort of documentation that these were actually real and were indeed distributed to executives of PanAm. Time is running short however, the folks who actually worked for PanAm during this time, and would have been senior enough to have been working in the executive offices of PAnAM would probably be in their late 70's or 80's. I read somewhere that all the remaining records of PanAm are archived in the library at the University of Florida. Possibly someone who has a lot of free time on their hands and lives around Gainsville, will go through the archives and attempt to find any records of the purchase of the watches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted August 2, 2012 Report Share Posted August 2, 2012 It is strange that someone, a widow, child of a a PanAm executive,or even someone who worked for panAm during that era hasn't come forward with some sort of documentation that these were actually real and were indeed distributed to executives of PanAm. I sometimes wonder if Rolex might have imposed a legal restriction (in exchange for financial remuneration) on agreements with some celebrities & high-profile individuals that block them from discussing details of acquisitions from or involvement with Rolex. For years, the source of the 65xx Sub worn by Sean Connery in the early Bond movies has been the subject of numerous hot debates within (& without) collecting circles & there have been numerous attempts to get Sean Connery to spill the beans (I know this from 1st-hand experience because I have a friend who knows Connery & he has yet to get any meaningful response on the subject out of the 007 star). However, he has said nothing. So, while it would seem logical that someone with direct knowledge of the albino 'Master would have spoken up by now, when it comes to Rolex, logic does not always work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now