Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all, bit of a situation. The gap between my end links and watch lugs is unbearable IMO.

The case is a 6538 from Mq.

The bracelet is a gen swiss 7206 rivet. Here is the issue:

Space between both lugs : 20.34mm

Width of gen end links 19.84mm (probably was 20mm 50 years ago.)

Now, can Anybody please shed any light on the width of yukis etc or any other rep "80" end links or and equally importantly, has anybody got any? I would be willing to swap for my Gen set.

Just after a tight fitment got my case.

Thanks guys........

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

That's weird, so basically the gap on your case is too large or the end links are too small. Hmmm

Mine is a phong case but gen 7206 and there's 0 gap.. Can I see a pic pls

post-38788-0-20551500-1394468198_thumb.j

Posted

The Gen 7206 is swiss but it's from MQ so you never know if he's put swiss or American end links on it.

Cc33, would you be able to measure you lugs gap, and or yor end links.

The watch is off to SSTEEL for some other work so I do not have any pics right now. Just measurements.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I will measure later when I can for now I can say, I don't trust Minh, you may have rep ends... Here's a Minh case with gen 7206 and gen ends.

post-38788-0-60513800-1394469027_thumb.j

Posted

Yep, defo does not look nothing like that. What are your end links? 80 or 58? Literature states 6538 used. 58 and Gmt 6542 used 80 which is what's on mine.

Could this be the issue?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I bought MQ's "best quality" band and it came with 80 endlinks.  One was an adequate fit, the other was too fat to go between the lugs.  The endlinks are so flimsy you can bend them with a pencil and your thumb.

 

One thing to check:  a gen band has a nice transition from the case to endlink to bracelet.  The midline of the lug when viewed from the side flows through the springbar hole, then right down the centerline of the band (again when viewed from the side).  This makes a smooth "face" to the band down the endlink and onto the band proper.

 

The MQ and Yuki bands have their endlinks attached weird so the centerline of the band (viewed from the side) sticks up above the centerline of the springbar hole.  This presents the "face" of the band above the "face" of the endlink and you can see the "end" of the band itself sticking up.  It looks odd, and is immediately recognizable.  In this photo you shouldn't see the places where the green lines touch, they should be hidden and not visible.

 

post-32-0-59485400-1394480321_thumb.jpg

 

Posted

According to my limited knowledge (and numbers in the pinned endlink thread here at RWG) I thought both endlinks should be exactly 20.0 mm... Can't answer for what's "Rolex spec variation" and what's rep spec

Posted

Hmmm ok.

"58 and 80 are very similar 58 is 0,5mm bigger in width,

the main difference is located at the back of the fitting,

the 'ears' of the 80 are larger and located lower than on

the 58"

I found this on network54. Not sure how legit the author is. But it would for sure give me the extra 0.5 I'm looking for.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up