GenTLe Posted July 14, 2014 Report Share Posted July 14, 2014 Guys, have you noticed this? LOVING it. Does anyone has purchased its rep ( http://www.torobravos2014.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=37_128_129&product_id=1024 )? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elchino Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 I'd also like to know if someone who owns one has a comment about this. It looks beautiful! Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devon85 Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Biggest known flaw on these watches is the triangle where the pearl is situated is not in-line with the triangle on the bezel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenTLe Posted July 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Rep VS gen picture. The gen obviously has the bezel clicked once, but the reb doesn't look bad to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krabbenkoenig Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 Except wrong fonts being used throughout the Dial (and the ring with the numbers around the dial is too thin). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devon85 Posted July 27, 2014 Report Share Posted July 27, 2014 Again look where the pearl is situated on the rep compared to the gen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenTLe Posted July 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 Well... I will survive to these flaws Like for my other Calibre de Cartier it is not a super rep, but I really like it too much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krabbenkoenig Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 Fair enough. btw. they spelled "Emirates" wrong - "Emirares" (engraving at the backside). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenTLe Posted July 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 btw. they spelled "Emirates" wrong - "Emirares" (engraving at the backside). Groan... This is bad... How the fu_k they do such idiotic errors... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krabbenkoenig Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 (edited) Well.. they probably thought that this a rare watch, thus they created Emirares. Btw. just spotted another one: The bezel inlay is badly aligned with the bezel (in the gen the numbers are aligned with the teeth in the bezel, in the rep it's quite random). Edited July 28, 2014 by Krabbenkoenig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devon85 Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 Groan... This is bad... How the fu_k they do such idiotic errors... Its such a nice watch I would buy one if there was not this much flaws Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kernow Posted July 29, 2014 Report Share Posted July 29, 2014 The insert can be realigned if you get a bad one. As for the spelling on the caseback, well, you'd have to live with it. At least you won't see it with it being on your wrist! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenTLe Posted July 29, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2014 The insert can be realigned if you get a bad one. As for the spelling on the caseback, well, you'd have to live with it. At least you won't see it with it being on your wrist! Moreover, actually if you look at my 1st pic (which is a gen one) you'll see that even on that one the bezel to internal numbers aren't perfectly aligned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.