sputim Posted February 8, 2015 Report Posted February 8, 2015 (edited) Yup gen or a very high end franken Edited February 8, 2015 by sputim
ProMariner Posted February 8, 2015 Report Posted February 8, 2015 (edited) It is a 100% genuine MK IV 16610LV. Slim 4 bezel, no rehaut, the dial is an MK IV DIAL, and everything else looks perfect, as the Cg's as the SEL/lugs fitment, Here is the MK IV from submariner story book: The mk V use the same dial and insert but has rehaut engraved. Edited February 8, 2015 by ingelero
ProMariner Posted February 8, 2015 Report Posted February 8, 2015 sure is not TC?? It might be based on a TC midcase, but from what I can see the insert, dial and rehaut match perfectly well the description of the mark IV and I personally never saw such a well replicated Mark IV dial. Where did you get this pictures from ? What is the origins of the watch ? BTW why the phuck the guy in the picture shave his arm lol ??!!
ProMariner Posted February 8, 2015 Report Posted February 8, 2015 My bet its a franken something isnt right What is wrong with it ? It is funny how people says it is gen or rep without any arguments ..
Mirkoray Posted February 8, 2015 Author Report Posted February 8, 2015 ok, I tell you the truth ... this is my new genuine ..and yes...this is a genuine.. 1
Ezio Posted February 8, 2015 Report Posted February 8, 2015 ok, I tell you the truth ... this is my new genuine ..and yes...this is a genuine.. Wow really ??looks Like there is way to much space between the Crown and the guards No matter what congratz on a beautiful watch own 2 a superfranken and a gen too they are beautiful
Mirkoray Posted February 8, 2015 Author Report Posted February 8, 2015 Thank you..yes this is a fantastic Sub!!
ProMariner Posted February 8, 2015 Report Posted February 8, 2015 ok, I tell you the truth ... this is my new genuine ..and yes...this is a genuine.. I knew it ! Congratulation it is a pure beauty ! Your mk IV is the last 16610LV without rehaut engravings, which gives it a more clean look imo
prdubis Posted February 8, 2015 Report Posted February 8, 2015 We still don't have the answer about this arm shaving...
AKTime Posted February 8, 2015 Report Posted February 8, 2015 Says a lot about the quality of a TC sub when you have to look this hard to see any differences. I would have guessed GEN based on SEL fit, dial quality and the seconds pinion.
wanlo Posted February 9, 2015 Report Posted February 9, 2015 16610lv is a beauty. Too bad they don't make it anymore.
dusk Posted February 9, 2015 Report Posted February 9, 2015 This LV is genuine?? Congrats! When I can afford to sink £4,500 into a watch I would have the same one as you before anything else! Here is my 2015 TC that arrived today for comparison
Mirkoray Posted February 10, 2015 Author Report Posted February 10, 2015 TC is good..but the rehauth is no Deep compare to genuine..trust me!!
ProMariner Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 We still don't have the answer about this arm shaving... 1
Kime Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 We still don't have the answer about this arm shaving... The arm shaving looks genuine to me I don't think TC did it !
Sbybbuser Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 Side effect of wearing gen, it raises your arm hairs.
Mirkoray Posted February 14, 2015 Author Report Posted February 14, 2015 ...are a bodybuilder, the whole body is shaved, not only my arms...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now