Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Cartier Santos 100 XL REP vs GEN Review


aflop

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

As part of my contribution to the forum, i always make a point to do comparisons or analysis of reps so we have more information on these boards. There's just too much taking of info and too little giving back!

I was lucky to be able to pick up a used Cartier Santos 100 XL for cheap and decided to do a quick comparison to my ultimate rep version:

A couple wrist shots to kick this off:

6386600c063e66f34dd9f8692022393a.jpg

68f40df1fb533a7aabf8cc6e2e38f4b7.jpg

7eb0e152ceb7c172d4f0e030498e5f2a.jpg

My first thought was that the dial of the rep was just slightly duller than the pearl effect of the gen, pretty hard to describe but there is a slight difference there. However, this is impossible to detect unless you have a gen right next to it. Overall feel of the watch on the wrist is pretty spot on with the gen feeling just a bit more 'solid' and heavier.

d6d076f1313e7aec116ffa982ed81713.jpg

Case shape and size is very accurate and no complaints there.

f7223ada7a3546982e7d1c92b12c419a.jpg

As expected the rep sapphire doesn't come close to gen and is much darker.

e3d36f7d46a519b905b59515ad823042.jpg

The engravings on the caseback is where we start to see the difference, albeit slight. Fonts on the 2656 being the most obvious and the alignment of fonts are off but again who's gonna notice when it's on your wrist and without a gen to compare side by side?

f8ef79c3d531c03798df9707a3f1d979.jpg

97fbf9e0142aae1611a458e9d1d2b93d.jpg

806d6b9385a189dd5fb1ab7a85142957.jpg

8fc977d5ead18386162213ed7cfe9b2c.jpg

91f72a7568cf89ff34dc413f84f9d1e9.jpg

Also noted the caseback screws are more rounded then gen:

c55f36ff4d7d43ee04ba25dea10d67b3.jpg

The clasp has a few notable issues, mainly the rounded screws of the rep as compared to the flatter ones of the gen:

9fffaf938d4f6d99917bf06e1c29e9fd.jpg

7592602d72ac8af376f30d43885810d0.jpg

The deployment clasp was well replicated apart from screw shapes which frankly shouldn't matter since it can't be seen when worn

76dcf8b2e4e1fe914e19425b9be3aa2b.jpg

Engravings are sharper on the gen but at least the right fonts and sizes were used on the rep!

e1e05d1efb0a4f09af6cd83bf4dc048f.jpg

One peeve was that the clasp was fit upside down vs the logo, obviously not a big issue but something that may not be fixed that easily. Not quite sure if it's unique to my piece so do let me know if that's the case for fellow owners. Basically when you don the strap the logo should be legible right way up to the wearer, then clasp should be closed inside then outside (not sure if I'm making sense here), but the rep was the other way around.

8e1a977404b6e44476a06833ab77a7d1.jpg

b573e74008b4c2aa5c8332c0c8eae00f.jpg

Whilst the lug pins are pretty similar, the rep ones are of poor qc with one of mine coming in a different shape. Doesn't affect the functionality though.

a41dc69109512307d14a4dec68ec5668.jpg

Construction of case between lugs were less sharp but did the job nonetheless.

01dbdc602ba1e28f47ab7935804b9537.jpg

Lume was pretty spot on but the gen obviously lasted longer than the rep

3e044f2e131be9c41e7f2be8840fc7bd.jpg

Summary:

All in all a fantastically replicated piece and truly deserving of a super rep status. Best bang for buck and the gen being something very affordable as well does not make this an easy call out on the wrist!

Hope you guys found the review helpful!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great comparison, thanks for showing us.

I would be able to tell a rep from gen now by looking at the 12 & 6 o'clock numerals where they join each other.

Notice on the gen they are joint just at the bottom but on the rep the numeral joint extends further up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have had my rep for 10 years. Bought at abay at the time.

It is really stunning, but the strap gave in some month ago.

The leather / glue around the pins broke.

Is it possible to get a new leather strap, which fits as good as the original?

 

(Actually the main reason for logging in, it's been ages, was to put it up for sale) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Actually the biggest tell is the edge of the sapphire glass. The gen and some ultimate version have frosty edges that you can't see the 'Swiss made' straight without tilting the angle. The cheaper rep edges are see-through.

The process of assembling both sapphires is different too. Cheaper rep is top down, and the gen or ultimate rep is bottom up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man that's a pretty close replica! You should put them both on a scale and compare the weight in grams, as well! That's the only picture you're missing! The only thing that I noticed was the coloring of the stitching and obviously the engravings are a little rougher machined on the replica. If you don't mind me asking, where did you purchase the rep from? I have been craving a Cartier Santos for a while, and after seeing this, I think I'm going to pull the trigger! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually the biggest tell is the edge of the sapphire glass. The gen and some ultimate version have frosty edges that you can't see the 'Swiss made' straight without tilting the angle. The cheaper rep edges are see-through.

 

The process of assembling both sapphires is different too. Cheaper rep is top down, and the gen or ultimate rep is bottom up.

For anyone interested, I found this replica on Toro Bravo's website; the one he has seems to have that "frosty" edge that Jion had pointed out:

http://www.torobravo2015.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=75_143&product_id=674

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Great comparison, thanks for showing us.

 

I would be able to tell a rep from gen now by looking at the 12 & 6 o'clock numerals where they join each other.

Notice on the gen they are joint just at the bottom but on the rep the numeral joint extends further up.

Good call. I think the "feet" of the roman numerals on the Rep, save for numerals II, III, IV and V are thicker than the ten, thus the way one number joins the other to form a numeral looks far thicker on the rep than the gen. Every feet is thicker on the rep. this is a great way to tell!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up