Mike on a bike Posted March 15, 2016 Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 I know we all buy gens so take a look see form your own opinion................ http://watchflipr.com/movements/sellita-sw200-vs-eta-2824-2/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSTEEL Posted March 15, 2016 Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 (edited) Considering Sellita supplied The Swatch Group with ETA branded movements once upon a time, its a no brainer than Sellita are just as good, if not better in some cases than ETA, Sellita even add an extra jewel in some of their movements, SW200, and SW220 (2836-2 type), so have 26J. Edited March 15, 2016 by SSTEEL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike on a bike Posted March 15, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 Am aware Micky just SW gets a bad name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSTEEL Posted March 15, 2016 Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 Indeed, its ignorance mainly, people jump to conclusions thinking the Sellita brand is a clone such as the various Chinese ETA clones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mymanmatt Posted March 15, 2016 Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 I think the bad name for sw is justified. Everyone I've seen needed to be replaced. And, they were new. I'm telling you, the quality of the parts in the sw is not good. That's my 2 cents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSTEEL Posted March 15, 2016 Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 13 minutes ago, mymanmatt said: I think the bad name for sw is justified. Everyone I've seen needed to be replaced. And, they were new. I'm telling you, the quality of the parts in the sw is not good. That's my 2 cents. Interesting Matt, I take it you are referring to the base calibre Sellitas? There are three grades. I've personally had no problems with any SW movements over the last three years working on hundreds of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike on a bike Posted March 15, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 Had a few watches with them no problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fraggle42 Posted March 15, 2016 Report Share Posted March 15, 2016 Same as Mike, got a few gens with Selitas in them and no problems at all. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike on a bike Posted March 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2016 Hey fraggle good to see you about old friend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unreformed66 Posted March 18, 2016 Report Share Posted March 18, 2016 (edited) On 3/15/2016 at 6:54 AM, mymanmatt said: I think the bad name for sw is justified. Everyone I've seen needed to be replaced. And, they were new. I'm telling you, the quality of the parts in the sw is not good. That's my 2 cents. This surprises me. I've only had a few Selittas across my bench but have found the quality to be just fine. As good as ETA in my opinion and I've done literally probably a thousand ETAs through the years. What exactly are the problems you're finding with them? I'd be interested to know. Edited March 18, 2016 by unreformed66 typo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhabar Posted March 18, 2016 Report Share Posted March 18, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJGladeRaider Posted March 29, 2016 Report Share Posted March 29, 2016 On 3/18/2016 at 1:37 PM, Buddhabar said: Nanuq ... Nanuq ... is that you Nanuq? If not, I suggest that you save that watch in a safe secure place til Nanuq dies ... you can easily claim that Nanuq modified that watch specially for you and it may have extraordinary collector's value then! Bill 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.