panasol Posted March 20, 2016 Report Share Posted March 20, 2016 looks quite decent but in Ryan's description the case is 44mm whereas the gen is 42mm I hope it's just a typo... white : http://www.intime.co/iwc/2713-aquatimer-automatic-iw329004-v6f-1-1-best-edition-on-ss-bracelet-miyota-9015.html black : http://www.intime.co/iwc/2712-aquatimer-automatic-iw329002-v6f-1-1-best-edition-on-ss-bracelet-miyota-9015.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panasol Posted March 20, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2016 the caseback is wrong they used the one of the iw376802 IWC Aquatimer Automatic Chronograph \ the correct caseback for the IW329004 is this one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike on a bike Posted March 20, 2016 Report Share Posted March 20, 2016 GOING BACK AND FORTH W/ GEN PICS LOOKS PRETTY GOOD OTHERWISE. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mule play Posted March 22, 2016 Report Share Posted March 22, 2016 I love IWC, but these models have nothing for me. The design looks clunky and unimaginative. The aquatimer series is the big miss in the portfolio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rolexman Posted March 22, 2016 Report Share Posted March 22, 2016 Single sided AR 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mule play Posted March 22, 2016 Report Share Posted March 22, 2016 oh...single sided ar is a major bummer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryaku Posted April 8, 2016 Report Share Posted April 8, 2016 On 3/21/2016 at 3:32 AM, mule play said: I love IWC, but these models have nothing for me. The design looks clunky and unimaginative. The aquatimer series is the big miss in the portfolio. Totally agree. The new Aquatimers are so much disappointing for me too, despite being fairly accurate (AR can be fixed easily, the wrong wording in the caseback is not a deal breaker for me). Someone posted a picture on RWI and the diameter seems to be spot on (42mm, like the gen). I wish they repped properly the old 3719 instead. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mule play Posted April 10, 2016 Report Share Posted April 10, 2016 Yes, the 3719 was perfect. I had a gen titanium model that I bought for my honeymoon on 2008. I wore it all over Mexico. I miss that one terribly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest idraw Posted April 11, 2016 Report Share Posted April 11, 2016 Is the 3719 the Slevin? Simply gorgeous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.