dgruter Posted March 2, 2007 Report Posted March 2, 2007 Any word or idea on how is the quality of rubber strap? I'm sure lots of u.PO owner are waiting to buy the rubber strap once this Casino Royale Bond watch is release Well, but does anyone actually know when it's coming out, if at all??? I personally don't like the special edition, but if they correct the dial logo design (omega logo sans feet), it would be the only PO to get. I don't care if they screw something else, I'll just swap dials with the Ultimate, and I 'll have a perfect PO to go with my genuine strap.
Nebakanezzar Posted March 2, 2007 Report Posted March 2, 2007 Generally speaking double AR coating sucks and that is why you seldom see it used... it is just a bad idea. Low end AR coating in unbearable... it makes the watch look dirty, smeared and smudged ALL THE TIME. High quality AR is better but still very prone to being dirty.... I can only imagine what REALLY low quality double AR would be like (likely what any fake would use). I would MUCH prefer single AR coating, it just makes more sense. The double AR on the new breitling SS is awsome! I havent had any "smudging" issues, and it wipes clean really easy!
nietzsche0904 Posted March 4, 2007 Report Posted March 4, 2007 the symbol is apparently for internal purposes only, some watches have it some don't even in the same run. at least that is hte consesus over at TZ
fitmic Posted March 12, 2007 Report Posted March 12, 2007 The prototype is finished, but still needs a few improvements for being released.
Nebakanezzar Posted March 12, 2007 Report Posted March 12, 2007 will this be black bezel only? or orange aswell?
b16a2 Posted March 13, 2007 Report Posted March 13, 2007 The genuine is only in black so it's probable it will only be available in black too.
r11co Posted March 13, 2007 Report Posted March 13, 2007 will this be black bezel only? or orange aswell? What a silly question?!
FxrAndy Posted March 19, 2007 Report Posted March 19, 2007 From what i hear we could be seeing this in a week of so, Q Why are weeks so long when you are waiting for things? and then there is the postal wait, and the customs wait, ah sh??
FxrAndy Posted April 16, 2007 Report Posted April 16, 2007 I sure wish we had some news on this, i mailed jay today ref another order and asked for some heads up on this, will let you all know if i get any thing.
twicebaked Posted April 30, 2007 Report Posted April 30, 2007 Hey guys, I was checking out silix's web site and he has the new Casino Royale PO now! What do you think?
r11co Posted April 30, 2007 Report Posted April 30, 2007 I'm keeping my comments to a minimum, except to describe it as disappointing....
docblackrock Posted April 30, 2007 Report Posted April 30, 2007 I'm keeping my comments to a minimum, except to describe it as disappointing.... Ditto :blink: Feel like I've wasted a lot of time to be honest....
FxrAndy Posted April 30, 2007 Report Posted April 30, 2007 I just had a quick look at the white number version and the date font is rubbish as usual but what other faults do you see?
b16a2 Posted April 30, 2007 Report Posted April 30, 2007 This might be failry inaccurate but this is what I think- Previous Casino Royale PO was an Ultimate PO with minor adjustments, this newer version looks very much like the predecessor to the Ultimate PO with minor adjustments?
r11co Posted April 30, 2007 Report Posted April 30, 2007 This might be failry inaccurate but this is what I think- Previous Casino Royale PO was an Ultimate PO with minor adjustments, this newer version looks very much like the predecessor to the Ultimate PO with minor adjustments? That is precisely what it is. 5th gen 45mm PO with the same flaws carried over - incorrect and faint date font, incorrect pearl and use of 2836 movement requiring a caseback that is too deep. I'm keeping schtum about what I think about the two new parts that have been added.
Fireman_Fred Posted May 3, 2007 Report Posted May 3, 2007 Ditto :blink: Feel like I've wasted a lot of time to be honest.... Very disappointing after all the hype ! The minute hand is shorter, the date font is rubbish and apart from the case back, second hand and Omega symbol, you are paying an extra $50 for not a lot...
fitmic Posted May 3, 2007 Report Posted May 3, 2007 you are paying an extra $50 for not a lot... Remember the watch is tested for water resistance.
Fireman_Fred Posted May 3, 2007 Report Posted May 3, 2007 Remember the watch is tested for water resistance. "Water resistance" - that covers a multitude of sins !!
Richard Tracy Posted May 3, 2007 Author Report Posted May 3, 2007 Let's not be too harsh, this being Jay's first try. We don't want him to get discouraged, however we do want to let him know in a tactful way, so when he completes our choices, expecially the Iwc,.. he's in a postive frame of mind.
coolfire Posted May 3, 2007 Report Posted May 3, 2007 Let's not be too harsh, this being Jay's first try. We don't want him to get discouraged, however we do want to let him know in a tactful way, so when he completes our choices, expecially the Iwc,.. he's in a postive frame of mind. Well said... I agree too.
docblackrock Posted May 3, 2007 Report Posted May 3, 2007 After some reflection I'll say publicly what hithero I've only shared privately.... I'm fairly certain something has gone seriously wrong with this project, there are too many details that don't add up compared to what Jay and I swapped many details over. I'm talking minutae here, the accurate reproduction of which, he was keen as anyone to bring to fruition. Just doesn't make any sense....unless the delay was due to the original maker pulling out? Like when your architect/builder walks off site halfway into a build and you're left with finding someone at very short notice to complete but whose standards are much much lower. I had it from the horse's mouth that the base for this would be the U-PO. Even the serial no. does not match the original spec.
Richard Tracy Posted May 3, 2007 Author Report Posted May 3, 2007 After some reflection I'll say publicly what hithero I've only shared privately.... I'm fairly certain something has gone seriously wrong with this project, there are too many details that don't add up compared to what Jay and I swapped many details over. I'm talking minutae here, the accurate reproduction of which, he was keen as anyone to bring to fruition. Just doesn't make any sense....unless the delay was due to the original maker pulling out? Like when your architect/builder walks off site halfway into a build and you're left with finding someone at very short notice to complete but whose standards are much much lower. I had it from the horse's mouth that the base for this would be the U-PO. Even the serial no. does not match the original spec. Makes sense,.... Let us know what he says about the errors and what can be done, if anything, to correct... otherwise he's invested into a void,.. something we don't want, or it could sink our future plans with him...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now