Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Running Sec's, Movements, And Daytona's Oh My...


smyrnasurfin

Recommended Posts

Ubiquitous - In reading your posts you really seem to like the Daytona's. It is one of the two watches (Bond Omega the other) as my next watch. After reading and reading I am still unsure what's better Running @ 6 or 9. Do I want 28.8 eta or the new 28 Asian or the old beat Asian?

I was just going to PM Ubiquitous with this but decided hey, let me get everyone (who wants to reply) opinion.

Any help would be appreciated - David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right out of the box running sec's at nine usually with the newer 7750 (28,800) is best. I'd personally stay away from the Daytona's and running seconds at six, depiste the instinctive urge. Ubiquitous's Daytona is a modified one with a gen el primiero? (Am I right Randy?) And a very nice one at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ubiquitous - In reading your posts you really seem to like the Daytona's. It is one of the two watches (Bond Omega the other) as my next watch. After reading and reading I am still unsure what's better Running @ 6 or 9. Do I want 28.8 eta or the new 28 Asian or the old beat Asian?

I was just going to PM Ubiquitous with this but decided hey, let me get everyone (who wants to reply) opinion.

Any help would be appreciated - David

Hmmmm... Yeah, I suppose you could say that I like the Daytona a little :p

So, really, you have a couple of choices for a sapphire crystal (modern and neovintage) Daytona-

Running seconds at 6:00 (the modified 7750 with seconds displaced to the 6:00 subsidiary) for the 116520/116509/116518/116519 etc. These are a bit touchy- The modification to the base movement to shift subdial output around requires 11 extra gears and much more strain on the movement having to push those extra gears (specifically the extra load required for the constantly running seconds subdial). Some watches have lasted over a year, while other last a few days. It's a bit of a game of chance. Aside form the movement issues, the case is quite thick to accommodate the modified movement - Bezel is taller, rehaut is deeper, caseback is deeper, and the position of the crown sits too far towards the caseback etc. A genuine 116520 for example is quite thin in relation at 12.4mm; so, this is a giveaway as to being a replica to anyone that knows Daytonas.

For seconds at 9:00, these are the 16520/16523/16528 models that are replicating the function of the Zenith El Primero. No modification necessary for the watch's functions, as the running seconds should be at 9:00, however, the subdial placement on these is typically spread out too far from the trademark closely grouped positions of the El Primero's subdials. The cases on these are about the right size (diameter and thickness), though, again, the crown is positioned too far back towards the caseback. For reliability, this one is probably a safer bet.

Now, personally, I did opt to build my own Zenith Daytona as Steve mentioned as the options out there just didn't satisfy. This was the solution that provided accuracy, function and longevity. The final product ends up costing a significant amount, but in the end, the results are about as close to a genuine 16520 as one can achieve without actually buying a genuine. The movement is the same base movement as what the genuine uses; genuine dials fit, as do hands with slight modification... Crowns, tubes, bezels, bracelets, rotors, bridges... To the eye, this one can truly be made 1:1.

205712-565.jpg

205712-566.jpg

Anyways... Just my $0.02... Weigh your desire for a Daytona with the cost you are willing to pay. If you want a long term keeper that will last through the generations, there is only one way to go (in my opinion).

Hope this helps :)

R

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmm... Yeah, I suppose you could say that I like the Daytona a little :p

So, really, you have a couple of choices for a sapphire crystal (modern and neovintage) Daytona-

Running seconds at 6:00 (the modified 7750 with seconds displaced to the 6:00 subsidiary) for the 116520/116509/116518/116519 etc. These are a bit touchy- The modification to the base movement to shift subdial output around requires 11 extra gears and much more strain on the movement having to push those extra gears (specifically the extra load required for the constantly running seconds subdial). Some watches have lasted over a year, while other last a few days. It's a bit of a game of chance. Aside form the movement issues, the case is quite thick to accommodate the modified movement - Bezel is taller, rehaut is deeper, caseback is deeper, and the position of the crown sits too far towards the caseback etc. A genuine 116520 for example is quite thin in relation at 12.4mm; so, this is a giveaway as to being a replica to anyone that knows Daytonas.

For seconds at 9:00, these are the 16520/16523/16528 models that are replicating the function of the Zenith El Primero. No modification necessary for the watch's functions, as the running seconds should be at 9:00, however, the subdial placement on these is typically spread out too far from the trademark closely grouped positions of the El Primero's subdials. The cases on these are about the right size (diameter and thickness), though, again, the crown is positioned too far back towards the caseback. For reliability, this one is probably a safer bet.

Now, personally, I did opt to build my own Zenith Daytona as Steve mentioned as the options out there just didn't satisfy. This was the solution that provided accuracy, function and longevity. The final product ends up costing a significant amount, but in the end, the results are about as close to a genuine 16520 as one can achieve without actually buying a genuine. The movement is the same base movement as what the genuine uses; genuine dials fit, as do hands with slight modification... Crowns, tubes, bezels, bracelets, rotors, bridges... To the eye, this one can truly be made 1:1.

205734-563.jpg

205734-564.jpg

Anyways... Just my $0.02... Weigh your desire for a Daytona with the cost you are willing to pay. If you want a long term keeper that will last through the generations, there is only one way to go (in my opinion).

Hope this helps :)

R

It helps alot. While I will probably not go the route you went, I am going to go with the secs at 9. I have my eye on one by King that has the Black Face with Red. I really love the look of that watch and don't know why. Actually I do know why, I love the look of it ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is probably the most accurate pre 2000 seconds at 9 Daytona I can find here: http://www.wo-mart.com/product_info.php?cP...products_id=625

It has a Swiss 7750 and is expensive, you may be able to get it with an Asian 7750 for a lot less. Notice the thin hour markers, that is correct for the pre 2000 Daytonas. Also the subdials are correct, the 20/40/60 is at nine where it should be, although they are not spaced close together like the gen.

Cheers :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is probably the most accurate pre 2000 seconds at 9 Daytona I can find here: http://www.wo-mart.com/product_info.php?cP...products_id=625

It has a Swiss 7750 and is expensive, you may be able to get it with an Asian 7750 for a lot less. Notice the thin hour markers, that is correct for the pre 2000 Daytonas. Also the subdials are correct, the 20/40/60 is at nine where it should be, although they are not spaced close together like the gen.

Cheers :D

OW! yeah I may not be quite there yet.

This is nice: http://www.wo-mart.com/product_info.php?cP...products_id=634

the one I like, although I am sure it is not very accurate: ROLEX DayTona 2004: ROASIA 7750 Movement / SAPPHIRE / STEEL / Waterproof 40m

What do you think?

post-4841-1172081412_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The vintage one is very nice looking, but it will probably have the older 7750? I could not say for sure, but you would want the newer 7750 version. The other watch you posted should not have the running seconds at 9. The subdial for running seconds should be at the 6 position for that watch. So the subdial spacing is wrong and the seconds are running in the wrong place.

If you just like the look of the watch then buy it for sure, but I would find the errors a dead give away.

Cheers :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buy the one you like, at the price you can pay and you'll enjoy it. It will always be a non original one, even it's the most beautiful Frankenstein with the best parts around build by the best mecanics around.

No disrespect to all the high quality owners and builders around here, i really enjoy seeing your watches and understand the outstanding quality of some of those watches.

Spent a lot of money? > Buy original at dealer.

Spent not to much ? > Make friends around here and you'll be guided what to look for

Spent a little but to much > Buy at an unknown Asian website and be disappointed or ripped.

Bought a ETA 7750@6 myself and love the watch, paid €400 / $ 520.

Jack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The vintage one is very nice looking, but it will probably have the older 7750? I could not say for sure, but you would want the newer 7750 version. The other watch you posted should not have the running seconds at 9. The subdial for running seconds should be at the 6 position for that watch. So the subdial spacing is wrong and the seconds are running in the wrong place.

If you just like the look of the watch then buy it for sure, but I would find the errors a dead give away.

Cheers :D

So on the dial it has the secs at 9, but it actually runs at 6?

King had this listed under the ASSIAN 7750 AT 9'CLOCK SECOND (maybe the two ss's in Asian is the give-away. :lol:

http://www.cclv.net/0.htm

Quoted $225 a couple weeks ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just chucking my 2p's worth in here, but IMO the models without the broad silver subdial rings look better with the seconds@9 movement as it draws less attention to the mis-spacing. They are pretty tricky to find now though.

Gotta, These Daytona's appear to be a bear to get semi-accurate for around $200.

Unlike the Noobmariner or the Ultimate PO's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again, here's THE link that everyone should always post (when responding to noobs' queries about Daytona). Why bother explaining it again and again... when it has already been explained (by the Man himself)? :)

http://www.rwg.cc/members/Movement-review-...at-6-t1414.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spent a lot of money? > Buy original at dealer.

For what one genuine 16520 Daytona would cost ($9k to $12k for a standard late model, and only available now on the secondary market), I can build 3 frankens with the same movements, genuine dials, hands, crowns, tubes, bezels, etc. My white dial Daytona is even complete with a genuine case.

In the end... It's still not a genuine. No box and papers, but no ridiculous mark up either and essentially the same watch on my wrist, and with the option to go with a different dial color the next day :) Since I'm not interested in selling, the 'genuine' aspect doesn't mean much... At least to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again, here's THE link that everyone should always post (when responding to noobs' queries about Daytona). Why bother explaining it again and again... when it has already been explained (by the Man himself)? :)

http://www.rwg.cc/members/Movement-review-...at-6-t1414.html

I forgot just how long and detailed this review was...it sure covers it all...there is little else that can be said.

RG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again, here's THE link that everyone should always post (when responding to noobs' queries about Daytona). Why bother explaining it again and again... when it has already been explained (by the Man himself)? :)

http://www.rwg.cc/members/Movement-review-...at-6-t1414.html

I have read all your Omega reviews and for the life of me don't know why I never read your movement reviews. Read, read, and more reading. Best way to learn.

Thanks By-Tor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have read all your Omega reviews and for the life of me don't know why I never read your movement reviews.

Maybe because I have never written a movement review? :lol: I have no skills to do those... I'm just a hobbyist. Ziggy takes care of all the complicated stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe because I have never written a movement review? :lol: I have no skills to do those... I'm just a hobbyist. The Zigmeister takes care of all the complicated stuff.

I am BAD at fully reading. Because you posted the link I never bothered to look at the author.

My humble apologizes to The Zigmeisterzumba. You are the movement man! :1a:

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up