section8 Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 This was posted on a forum i frequent, only shot I have. The angle is bad, but i believe it's a rep. The bezel teeth don't look right to me and the pearl doesn't look good either, but then again, i'm not a sub expert. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alligoat Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 I looked at the rehaut first, is it a little thin? And I agree w/ the bezel teeth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 Fake. Bezel isn't thick enough, rehaut too shallow, hands are terrible (look at that secs hand and hour hand), dial is garbage with junk indicies, insert is [censored]... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stilty Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 I looked at the rehaut first, is it a little thin? And I agree w/ the bezel teeth. And the hands... they look flat, especially from that angle. They should look slightly domed and thin out at the edges. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southcoast68 Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 The rehaut also appears to have a mirror-like appearence, a definate no-no. This one is much like the old $25 quartz subs of years ago. My $.02 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section8 Posted March 2, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 Thanks guys, i thought it didn't look right but I still can't pick out the details like everyone else Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bklm1234 Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 I'm adding: low crystal, crystal doesn't merge with rehaut, flat pearl, bezel teeth lacks definition. -bm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elprimerozen Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 Fake all the way! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzy Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 I agree, this is fake, no doubt about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddhead Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 Fake. Bezel isn't thick enough, rehaut too shallow, hands are terrible (look at that secs hand and hour hand), dial is garbage with junk indicies, insert is [censored]... so what do you really think/ i cannot stand it when people refuse to take a hard position on issues or topics... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.