Rep or gen?

[section8]

This was posted on a forum i frequent, only shot I have.

The angle is bad, but i believe it's a rep. The bezel teeth don't look right to me and the pearl doesn't look good either, but then again, i'm not a sub expert.

[alligoat]

I looked at the rehaut first, is it a little thin? And I agree w/ the bezel teeth.

[ubiquitous]

Fake. Bezel isn't thick enough, rehaut too shallow, hands are terrible (look at that secs hand and hour hand), dial is garbage with junk indicies, insert is [censored]...

[stilty]

  alligoat said:

I looked at the rehaut first, is it a little thin? And I agree w/ the bezel teeth.

And the hands... they look flat, especially from that angle. They should look slightly domed and thin out at the edges.

[southcoast68]

The rehaut also appears to have a mirror-like appearence, a definate no-no. This one is much like the old $25 quartz subs of years ago. My $.02

[section8]

Thanks guys, i thought it didn't look right but I still can't pick out the details like everyone else

[bklm1234]

I'm adding: low crystal, crystal doesn't merge with rehaut, flat pearl, bezel teeth lacks definition.

-bm

[elprimerozen]

Fake all the way!

[Ozzy]

I agree, this is fake, no doubt about it.

[eddhead]

  ubiquitous said:

Fake. Bezel isn't thick enough, rehaut too shallow, hands are terrible (look at that secs hand and hour hand), dial is garbage with junk indicies, insert is [censored]...

so what do you really think/ i cannot stand it when people refuse to take a hard position on issues or topics...