Rolexman Posted May 6, 2006 Report Posted May 6, 2006 (edited) Diameter PO: 42,5 mm Steelfish: 44 mm Edited May 6, 2006 by Rolexman
BilboBaggins Posted May 8, 2006 Report Posted May 8, 2006 the breitling is ... wear them well! Nice watches...like the look of that Breit Jon
gran Posted May 8, 2006 Report Posted May 8, 2006 Great comparison Rolexman and I think the fact that the Steelfish is closer to the camera than the PO is adding to the effect. In fact the PO looks a little boring next to the Steelfish. g.
BilboBaggins Posted May 8, 2006 Report Posted May 8, 2006 In fact the PO looks a little boring next to the Steelfish. g. Yeh thats a good shout...i guess the Breit is more sporty, whereas the PO is more of a dress watch. I still love the look of the PO, but that Steelfish is one chunky mother-lover Jon
Richard Tracy Posted May 8, 2006 Report Posted May 8, 2006 That Breit is one big chunky piece of steel, and a great looking watch ! The 42mm PO however I found too small, especially the dial, but the 45mm version is Just Right, size wise, but I can't wait until a new version comes out which I hope will correct the he valve placement give us a quality crystal, and thicken the markers to spec. ETA or CN.. whatever comes first... Thanks for the post...
BilboBaggins Posted May 8, 2006 Report Posted May 8, 2006 That Breit is one big chunky piece of steel, and a great looking watch ! The 42mm PO however I found too small, especially the dial, but the 45mm version is Just Right, size wise, but I can't wait until a new version comes out which I hope will correct the he valve placement give us a quality crystal, and thicken the markers to spec. ETA or CN.. whatever comes first... Thanks for the post... Weird...im the opposite! I have quite small wrists...and the Steelfish is just too chunky...i tried it on many a time...but it never looked right . However the 42mm PO looks spot on Thank god they make these different sizes, so everyone is catered for! Jon
Rolexman Posted May 8, 2006 Author Report Posted May 8, 2006 (edited) The 42mm PO however I found too small, especially the dial, but the 45mm version is Just Right, size wise, I find the 45mm version of the PO too big for such a 'classy' watch. Like Jon said; the PO is more of a dress watch. Edited May 8, 2006 by Rolexman
Richard Tracy Posted May 8, 2006 Report Posted May 8, 2006 I find the 45mm version of the PO too big for such a 'classy' watch. Like Jon said; the PO is more of a dress watch. Having owned both 42 & 45mm po's... I can say that the full size is not so large... plays much smaller than a 44mm panerai, which I own several as well. As for it being a dress watch, I consider it an all occasion diver.. and don't forget that the PO is the New Bond watch...and he's doing some pretty undressy things while wearing it.
warbody Posted May 8, 2006 Report Posted May 8, 2006 you mean bond will use tuxedo's and all with a PO ? ....
gran Posted May 8, 2006 Report Posted May 8, 2006 you mean bond will use tuxedo's and all with a PO ? .... No bond... Its dressy even without clothes..... and with
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now