Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

They don't build them like they used to


predfan2001

Recommended Posts

Here's a couple of pics of an auto accident that occured here in my town. A classic 1959 Corvette hit a Jeep Wrangler head on. The driver of the Jeep had her seat belt on and walked away with no injuries. The Corvette had no seat belts and the driver received major trauma to his lower body. He lived but is in pretty bad shape I hear. The pics speak for themselves:

285533-8701.jpg

285533-8702.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would anyone not wear a seat belt?

There were no seat-belts in a '59.

I'm not sure about German/UK automobiles, but my father was an avid collector of 60's classics & I believe American cars didn't start standard stocking seat belts until '65, and trucks until '68.

Plus, people love to tout the older cars as being "tanks"; thicker steel, stronger body, etc. Which is true; but that's not want you want. You want the care to break apart easier; let the crumple zones & the unitized body absorb the inertia from the impact, not your body.

Edited by gioarmani
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were no seat-belts in a '59.

Then they shouldn't be driven. I wonder if that kind of behaviour affects your insurance premiums. :D

Actually, I've thought for a while that the best method for stopping car crashes would be to put an 18" spike in the centre of the steering wheel facing the driver. We'd see a lot less minor accidents that way. :Jumpy:

ps. My actual view is a lot less extreme than that, but a lot less amusing. As a motorcyclist, I think not wearing a helmet is seriously stupid as is not wearing a seat belt, but if you love classic cars, then you should be able to sign a waiver (and an organ donor card) that shows you're making an informed choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were no seat-belts in a '59.

I'm not sure about German/UK automobiles, but my father was an avid collector of 60's classics & I believe American cars didn't start standard stocking seat belts until '65, and trucks until '68.

Plus, people love to tout the older cars as being "tanks"; thicker steel, stronger body, etc. Which is true; but that's not want you want. You want the care to break apart easier; let the crumple zones & the unitized body absorb the inertia from the impact, not your body.

Yeah, you're right. Seat belts were optional then. I guess the real reason this hits home for me is we just sold my mom's 56 Vette. After seeing this I'd be scared to death to drive it.

285651-8647.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the second photo again Pugs... the steering column in older cars IS essentially that 18" spike you mentioned... they didn't "break away" like the modern designs do.... essentially act as a spear with a wheel on em for the driver.

Also an issue with the older design... in a headon crash the engine doesn't drop to the pavement like in modern cars... it lands in the lap of the driver.... I'd be willing to bet that the engine and transmission caused a good portion of the drivers injuries in that wreck.... notice that the "drivers compartment" (area around the pedals mainly) collapsed.... another thing that modern cars have going for em... they break apart into many many pieces... but the area where the driver/passengers sit usually remains fairly intact.

As someone who appreciates older cars for their designs... (beauty vette there Predfan.. the hardtop is a wonderful thing)... I know that for oldercars that are intended to be driven there are retrofit seatbelt kits that attach to the seat mounting brackets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up