predfan2001 Posted July 21, 2007 Report Share Posted July 21, 2007 Here's a couple of pics of an auto accident that occured here in my town. A classic 1959 Corvette hit a Jeep Wrangler head on. The driver of the Jeep had her seat belt on and walked away with no injuries. The Corvette had no seat belts and the driver received major trauma to his lower body. He lived but is in pretty bad shape I hear. The pics speak for themselves: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratedzeus Posted July 21, 2007 Report Share Posted July 21, 2007 No seatbelts = DEATH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted July 21, 2007 Report Share Posted July 21, 2007 Why would anyone not wear a seat belt? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gioarmani Posted July 21, 2007 Report Share Posted July 21, 2007 (edited) Why would anyone not wear a seat belt? There were no seat-belts in a '59. I'm not sure about German/UK automobiles, but my father was an avid collector of 60's classics & I believe American cars didn't start standard stocking seat belts until '65, and trucks until '68. Plus, people love to tout the older cars as being "tanks"; thicker steel, stronger body, etc. Which is true; but that's not want you want. You want the care to break apart easier; let the crumple zones & the unitized body absorb the inertia from the impact, not your body. Edited July 21, 2007 by gioarmani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryyannon Posted July 21, 2007 Report Share Posted July 21, 2007 Damned shame for the 'vette Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted July 21, 2007 Report Share Posted July 21, 2007 There were no seat-belts in a '59. Then they shouldn't be driven. I wonder if that kind of behaviour affects your insurance premiums. Actually, I've thought for a while that the best method for stopping car crashes would be to put an 18" spike in the centre of the steering wheel facing the driver. We'd see a lot less minor accidents that way. ps. My actual view is a lot less extreme than that, but a lot less amusing. As a motorcyclist, I think not wearing a helmet is seriously stupid as is not wearing a seat belt, but if you love classic cars, then you should be able to sign a waiver (and an organ donor card) that shows you're making an informed choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
predfan2001 Posted July 21, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2007 There were no seat-belts in a '59. I'm not sure about German/UK automobiles, but my father was an avid collector of 60's classics & I believe American cars didn't start standard stocking seat belts until '65, and trucks until '68. Plus, people love to tout the older cars as being "tanks"; thicker steel, stronger body, etc. Which is true; but that's not want you want. You want the care to break apart easier; let the crumple zones & the unitized body absorb the inertia from the impact, not your body. Yeah, you're right. Seat belts were optional then. I guess the real reason this hits home for me is we just sold my mom's 56 Vette. After seeing this I'd be scared to death to drive it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratedzeus Posted July 22, 2007 Report Share Posted July 22, 2007 Many old Mercedes don't have seatbelts. They were available of course but optional... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cornerstone Posted July 22, 2007 Report Share Posted July 22, 2007 Seatbelt or no seatbelt, I think the cause of the lower body trauma was smashing into an SUV in a classic car with next-to-no crumple zone, etc. On the seatbelt front, I'm always incredulous that the contestants on The Amazing Race rarely seem to wear them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OiRogers Posted July 23, 2007 Report Share Posted July 23, 2007 Look at the second photo again Pugs... the steering column in older cars IS essentially that 18" spike you mentioned... they didn't "break away" like the modern designs do.... essentially act as a spear with a wheel on em for the driver. Also an issue with the older design... in a headon crash the engine doesn't drop to the pavement like in modern cars... it lands in the lap of the driver.... I'd be willing to bet that the engine and transmission caused a good portion of the drivers injuries in that wreck.... notice that the "drivers compartment" (area around the pedals mainly) collapsed.... another thing that modern cars have going for em... they break apart into many many pieces... but the area where the driver/passengers sit usually remains fairly intact. As someone who appreciates older cars for their designs... (beauty vette there Predfan.. the hardtop is a wonderful thing)... I know that for oldercars that are intended to be driven there are retrofit seatbelt kits that attach to the seat mounting brackets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.