PAMman Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 Can anyone confirm, preferably with photos, the accuracy of the so-called 'closed factory' Bond Seamaster? I understand that this was fitted with an ETA 2892 and is the most accurate Seamaster rep to date. Apart from the accuracy of the detail how does the quality of the build compare to the MBW DRSD for example? I know that these Bond watches are no longer available but I'm considering offering my modded DRSD (by Plapatine) in exchange for one of these Seamasters. The DRSD has a gen crown / tube, modded CGs, drilled lugs and bracelet, aged lume and aged/polished case with paint removed from the caseback. The question really is: Are these two watches comparable in terms of quality and accuracy?.....Is this a sensible notion at all? I came to the rep scene too late to buy this Seamaster new and my tastes have changed from Rollie to other brands anyhow. Any advice, suggestions etc appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 I understand that this was fitted with an ETA 2892 Not true. It was fitted with a Seagull copy. I believe that it was also available with an ETA2824, however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazz Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 As Pugwash has said definitely a seagull not an ETA, the closed factory was the 007 model and pretty sure they did not come with the 2824 due to the slim case profile but yea they were very good quality especially for the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By-Tor Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 Omega Guide has this review linked (by kdo2milger): http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=9242 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markkin Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 I own both the Omega Seamaster Professional James Bond Limited ETA 2892-A2 (Seagull) and the other ETA 2824. The ETA 2829-A2 feels heavier with sturdier bracelet. The ETA 2824 bracelet is cheap and weak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Febus Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 The seamaster I'm posting here had the more accurate bracelet with pins (almost exactly the same as my gen) and ETA2824. Sadly it was stolen in a burglary, not so sadly the insurance company paid out for a genuine despite my writing 'REPLICA' clearly on the form. However have you considered that you can buy a genuine from ebay for 2.5 times the cost of your MBW? That's exactly what I did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r11co Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 The ETA 2824 bracelet is cheap and weak. Be careful with that generalisation. Despite production of the best ST-18/2824 SMPs stopping over 2 years ago, availability of 2824 based SMP reps has continued to this date but successive releases have seen deteriorations in quality that are well documented eg. loss of 3 o'clock hour marker, band going through several changes including dispensing with genuine-style pins and tubes, loss of the 5-piece compound end-link to be replaced with a cheaper single casting, changes in size/font of dial print - usually for the worse, etc. etc. etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMman Posted August 4, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 Thanks for all the responses. I have one of the earlier ETA Seamaster reps with the good bracelet (pins and segmented end-links) and good dial with 3 o'clock marker. However it has the thicker case (higher caseback), HR valve incorrect at 10 exactly. I just trying to improve accuracy with the case etc but possibly it's 'not worth the candle'. I also have one of the black ETA SMPs with the correct HR position and better crownguards but the overall quality of the case and bracelet is not as good as the older rep. Just another case of 'two steps forward and three steps backwards??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcher Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 I had an early top grade 007 model as discussed which came from 'JackieChen' (of which some early guys will remember but long before this forum came top life) at a cost of over $500 which was an awful lot 4 years ago! This watch had a verified eta 2892-a2 inside and was as good in quality to the real deal. I wish I still had it! I think they did vary as time went on. A shame! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazz Posted August 5, 2007 Report Share Posted August 5, 2007 Some pic's of my modded 007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.