316L Posted September 20, 2007 Report Share Posted September 20, 2007 (edited) enjoy... Edited September 20, 2007 by 316L Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted September 20, 2007 Report Share Posted September 20, 2007 What are we looking at here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
316L Posted September 20, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2007 pugwash my best friend... how are you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmg Posted September 20, 2007 Report Share Posted September 20, 2007 Nice 316L! Hmmm, it sure looks like there is a new and improved 1665 caseback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephane Posted September 20, 2007 Report Share Posted September 20, 2007 What are we looking at here? Reps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dieselpower Posted September 20, 2007 Report Share Posted September 20, 2007 So you've taken a load of photos of your MBW's. Sorry to be a party pooper but is there a point to this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
316L Posted September 20, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2007 So you've taken a load of photos of your MBW's. Sorry to be a party pooper but is there a point to this? are you a party pooper? a point? yes of course. read the headline. and you will understand it ;-) i hope so... i don't know much about the mbk ( mbw ) watches, but i will learn. today i have read there are different to the older version. and the pics of my items are the latest. "freshly arrived from mbk bkk" well, i will hope do you understand. i will share my pics to verify this impressionn. the specialists of these watches can give a lot more information about that. for my bucks i will get the best. enjoy your lifetime. 316L Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephane Posted September 20, 2007 Report Share Posted September 20, 2007 wow, well that is an interresting statement. You have MBK now and we have MBW ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
316L Posted September 20, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2007 the king is dead...long live the king! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cskent69 Posted September 20, 2007 Report Share Posted September 20, 2007 Well i am a little confused about the post as well - but...... 1. Nice new caseback on the 1665 2. Interesting that there seem to be different bezels...from Sub to seadweller 3. datewheel looks nice - not sure if accurate though. 4. Is that a working HE value on the SD? 5. No improvement to bracelet unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvio Posted September 21, 2007 Report Share Posted September 21, 2007 (edited) enjoy... Nice pics! :-) Sorry, probably a noob question: Why does thefont used lug engraving of the ref. and ser.number on the 1665 seems a bit different than the old MBK/MBW? Please correct me in case this is wrong. Thanks for sharing. Edited September 21, 2007 by silvio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ptolomeo Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 Why the 1680 case number is 5513? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephane Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 Why the 1680 case number is 5513? Correct me if I'm wrong, but is has allways been the case on genuine old MBW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jiro Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 ummm....he's posting pictures of his watches.....that is....what we do here....no? Share our pictures and knowledges and say our opinion about it...... What's there to be confused about??? I don't get it..... Great looking watch my friend!!! and awesome pictures as well~! I'm not really into vintage divers yet but soon I know I will be~ hehe~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ptolomeo Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 Correct me if I'm wrong, but is has allways been the case on genuine old MBW I know, Stephane. Mine is so and it suprised me. I was just asking why the makers decided to put an incorrect case serial in the MBW? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephane Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 Good point, economy scale ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
316L Posted September 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 further it's not a ®olex it's a (p)olex, i was very surprised Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now