here we have the last pics of my bloody f*cking tramp mbk / mbw rolex 1665 1680 version watches ;-)

[316L]

enjoy...

Edited September 20, 2007 by 316L

[Pugwash]

What are we looking at here?

[316L]

pugwash my best friend...

how are you...

[tmg]

Nice 316L!

Hmmm, it sure looks like there is a new and improved 1665 caseback.

[Stephane]

What are we looking at here?

Reps

[dieselpower]

So you've taken a load of photos of your MBW's. Sorry to be a party pooper but is there a point to this?

[316L]

So you've taken a load of photos of your MBW's. Sorry to be a party pooper but is there a point to this?

are you a party pooper?

a point? yes of course.

read the headline. and you will understand it ;-)

i hope so...

i don't know much about the mbk ( mbw ) watches,

but i will learn.

today i have read there are different to the older version.

and the pics of my items are the latest.

"freshly arrived from mbk bkk"

well, i will hope do you understand.

i will share my pics to verify this impressionn.

the specialists of these watches can give

a lot more information about that.

for my bucks i will get the best.

enjoy your lifetime.

316L

[Stephane]

wow, well that is an interresting statement.

You have MBK now and we have MBW ?

[316L]

the king is dead...long live the king!

[cskent69]

Well i am a little confused about the post as well - but......

1. Nice new caseback on the 1665

2. Interesting that there seem to be different bezels...from Sub to seadweller

3. datewheel looks nice - not sure if accurate though.

4. Is that a working HE value on the SD?

5. No improvement to bracelet unfortunately.

[silvio]

enjoy...

Nice pics! :-)

Sorry, probably a noob question: Why does thefont used lug engraving of the ref. and ser.number on the 1665 seems a bit different than the old MBK/MBW?

Please correct me in case this is wrong.

Thanks for sharing.

Edited September 21, 2007 by silvio

[Ptolomeo]

Why the 1680 case number is 5513?

[Stephane]

Why the 1680 case number is 5513?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is has allways been the case on genuine old MBW

[jiro]

ummm....he's posting pictures of his watches.....that is....what we do here....no?

Share our pictures and knowledges and say our opinion about it......

What's there to be confused about??? I don't get it.....

Great looking watch my friend!!! and awesome pictures as well~!

I'm not really into vintage divers yet but soon I know I will be~ hehe~

[Ptolomeo]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is has allways been the case on genuine old MBW

I know, Stephane. Mine is so and it suprised me. I was just asking why the makers decided to put an incorrect case serial in the MBW?

[Stephane]

Good point, economy scale ?

[316L]

further it's not a ®olex it's a (p)olex, i was very surprised