jeff g Posted July 31, 2006 Report Share Posted July 31, 2006 (edited) Here I am revitalizing this post again, but I am wondering what you folks who own a GST think about the difference, as far as quality, finish, weight, dial, etc., between the black faced TT version and the SS black dial version. Wondering if one feels or looks better than the other etc. I know it is a judgement call, but I want to order one of these beauties, and I am looking for opinions. Both are beautiful watches. Edited July 31, 2006 by jeff g Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted July 31, 2006 Report Share Posted July 31, 2006 I know it is a judgement call, but I want to order one of these beauties, and I am looking for opinions. Both are beautiful watches. You want the Titanium. That's it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dani Posted August 11, 2006 Report Share Posted August 11, 2006 Very very nice watches. I have the GST TI on the way soon i hope. Cheers and Thanks for the great pics.. Dani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rwg777 Posted August 11, 2006 Report Share Posted August 11, 2006 Nice bent 2nd hand. Nice picture taking too! What camera is that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted August 11, 2006 Report Share Posted August 11, 2006 What camera is that? He uses a Canon PowerShot G3, but it's not about the camera. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alextor Posted August 11, 2006 Report Share Posted August 11, 2006 He uses a Canon PowerShot G3, but it's not about the camera. It's all about the lighting... A PS: Pugs is the expert both on light and the IWC ti...apparently the only 'flaw' (if anyone can call it that ) is the close proximity of the N (on shaffhausen...) to the marker (...measured by NASA to be 0.34 armstrongs too close...so I'm waiting for the next generation ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugwash Posted August 11, 2006 Report Share Posted August 11, 2006 It's all about the lighting... A PS: Pugs is the expert both on light and the IWC ti...apparently the only 'flaw' (if anyone can call it that ) is the close proximity of the N (on shaffhausen...) to the marker (...measured by NASA to be 0.34 armstrongs too close...so I'm waiting for the next generation ) There are two flaws: The Schaffhausen text being too far left and the lack of lume. That's it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.