Quarks Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 Surfing on Joshua's website and stumbled into the 202. I don't wanna rip his pics on here unless he gives permission but anyhow here is the link: http://perfect-clones.com/product_info.php...roducts_id=1085 The dial has some flaws on it but overall looks pretty good. The crown is definitely too thin. The screw locks on pushers are too thin as well. Based on the measurement display on the post Josh made over her, the diameter of this 202 is indeed smaller. The bezel diameter should be 47mm, excluding the crown guard. Nevertheless, I think we are off to a good start. I am definitely hoping for a more improved version. Will I buy this? Well, never say never.....
olreon Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 hello, if there is a improved version of this one with fixed flaws... this would be a much better deal than the pam187... no problem with the date wheel and the date window position... best wishes olreon
dadog13 Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 it is good for strat...now they can only improve it with the next editions... however, i'll wait for a better version...
olreon Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 hello, of course, a improved version is always better... best wishes olreon
azgjav Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 seems like it's using the older 7750 movement.. fantasy size or not, 44mm's perfect for me!!
panerailord Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 http://shopping.e-conveni.net/item_info.ht...ucts_id=819341& this is from watchspo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pre V Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 One closer look at Watchonpo's images, the fonts on the 202 are Pre-Vendome fonts.... Looks like a new submersible is hitting the market...
Quarks Posted May 28, 2006 Author Report Posted May 28, 2006 Jebus... watchhonpo's pics.... *checks wallet*
azgjav Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 it's 47mm on honpo's site...sighz...not for me, not for me.. quarks, it's 300usd! it'll be easy on ur wallet!
www_watch Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 Nevertheless, I think we are off to a good start. I am definitely hoping for a more improved version. Will I buy this? Well, never say never..... How could this be a good start? Even the case is COMPLETELY wrong. Why don´t they use the same case that they made for the 187? Maybe then we could talk about a good start.
Guest Sql_pl Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 Even in genuine form I definately prefer 187 over a 202. This rep is quite... flawed to say the least. But time will possibly bring something better! Cheers!
Watchmeister Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 Unfortunately, this watch has nothing to do with, nor does it have any of the best parts of, the 187. When Watchonpo is selling it for $280 it has to be absolute crap. The beauty of the 187, irrespective of its ridiculous price and crappy movement, is the case, solid 60 click bezel system and 5mm crystal. This 202 has none of this. This version does not bode well at all.
Quarks Posted May 28, 2006 Author Report Posted May 28, 2006 it's 47mm on honpo's site...sighz...not for me, not for me.. 47mm not for you? Your wrist is bigger than mine!
thomasng Posted May 28, 2006 Report Posted May 28, 2006 Watchhonpo is selling this for 30,000 yen, while the 187 is going for 150% more. That's not a good sign. This rep looks absolutely horrific, just plain pathetic, IMO.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now